Thu, 2008-06-26 22:17 - ceda
1990: Volume 11
Front matter
Murphy & Murphy, Resolutional relevance: a primary standard for evaluating criteria in non-policy debate
Berube, Parameters for criteria debating
Meldrum, Development of the method of evaluation in CEDA debate
Preston, The potential for generic argumentation in cross examination debate association debate: toward the development of standards
Mallin, The application of proximate cause to CEDA debate
O'Dor, A process perspective of definitional arguments
FORUM
Steinfatt, College debate: a quarter century later
Brey, An analysis of CEDA judging philosophies--Part II: accepting certain tactics and arguments with reservations
Stepp, Taking CEDA debaters out of the normal tournament setting
Smith, To disclose or not to disclose?
Front matter
Murphy & Murphy, Resolutional relevance: a primary standard for evaluating criteria in non-policy debate
Berube, Parameters for criteria debating
Meldrum, Development of the method of evaluation in CEDA debate
Preston, The potential for generic argumentation in cross examination debate association debate: toward the development of standards
Mallin, The application of proximate cause to CEDA debate
O'Dor, A process perspective of definitional arguments
FORUM
Steinfatt, College debate: a quarter century later
Brey, An analysis of CEDA judging philosophies--Part II: accepting certain tactics and arguments with reservations
Stepp, Taking CEDA debaters out of the normal tournament setting
Smith, To disclose or not to disclose?
CATEGORY:
»
