jason russell

[Rebecca Galetine]

please email me

>From  Fri Aug 14 14:56:08 1998
Message-Id: <FRI.14.AUG.1998.145608.0500.>
Received: from LIST.UVM.EDU by LIST.UVM.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8c) with
 spool id 10806 for EDEBATE at LIST.UVM.EDU; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 15:56:43
 -0400
Received: from mail.midusa.net (mail.midusa.net [206.28.168.5]) by list.uvm.edu
 (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with ESMTP id PAA40428 for
 <EDEBATE at LIST.UVM.EDU>; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 15:56:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from midusa.net (node138.salina.midusa.net [206.28.169.138]) by
 mail.midusa.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA05411; Fri, 14 Aug
 1998 14:54:37 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <l03110701b1f9ddc233e4@[90.0.0.52]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <35D49657.917296A8 at midusa.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 14:56:08 -0500
Reply-To: race at midusa.net
To: Team Topic Debating in America <EDEBATE at LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: David Rhaesa <race at MIDUSA.NET>
Organization: smiling small thoughts
Subject: Re: Wacked Case Thoughts
Comments: To: Chris Cooper <ccooper at CKRC.ORG>

of course i thought of that one given some of my past interpretations but at
least early on it doesn't seem to be too wise.

Chris Cooper wrote:

> Has anybody given consideration to "past tense" cases (for lack of a better
> title)?  For example, would it be possible for the Aff. to pick one of the
> amendments to T7 of the CRA made in 1991, and make a defense of the
> protections it has offered since?  Am I smokin crack to think this may be
> legitimate under the wording of this resolution?
>
> COOP
> Geoge Washington University