questions for anti-nader pro-gore folks
Mon Sep 4 12:31:13 CDT 2000
We all heard these sound bites in the convention speech. We are all still
asking where is the substance? Gotta admit though, had Al listed it this
way, it would've been pretty much the same as his whole speech. Good
outline, not much proof.
Director of Debate
Emporia High School
>From: Steven Hunt <hunt at LCLARK.EDU>
>Postive reasons to vote for Al Gore
>#l Environmental positions on greenhouse effect (slow it), save estuaries,
>don't have voluntary air and water pollution standards
>#2 For affirmative action for women and minorities
>#3 For patients rights s.s. prescription drug coverage and eventual
>universal health care
>#4 For campaign finance reform yeah yeah Buddhist temple not withstanding
>#5 Opposes English only
>#6 For minimum wage increases
>#7 For constructive gun controls
>#8 Pay UN dues
>#9 For fair census taking including sampling data
>#l0 Not for tax give away to wealthiest l0% of US tax payers.
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>From Mon Sep 4 14:17:26 2000
Received: from LIST.UVM.EDU by LIST.UVM.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with
spool id 4411 for EDEBATE at LIST.UVM.EDU; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:18:22 -0400
Received: from imo-r01.mx.aol.com (imo-r01.mx.aol.com [18.104.22.168]) by
list.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA29502 for
<edebate at list.uvm.edu>; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:18:22 -0400
Received: from MWBRYANT at aol.com by imo-r01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.15.) id
i.78.9ce17c6 (4265); Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:17:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 119
Message-ID: <78.9ce17c6.26e54136 at aol.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:17:26 EDT
Reply-To: MWBRYANT at AOL.COM
To: Team Topic Debating in America <EDEBATE at LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Michael Bear Bryant <MWBRYANT at AOL.COM>
Subject: Re: questions for anti-nader pro-gore folks
Comments: To: elliottdarren at hotmail.com
In a message dated 9/4/00 11:32:22 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
elliottdarren at HOTMAIL.COM writes:
> We all heard these sound bites in the convention speech. We are all still
> asking where is the substance? Gotta admit though, had Al listed it this
> way, it would've been pretty much the same as his whole speech. Good
> outline, not much proof.
Did you expect him to "read cards" in a convention speech? You want him to
preempt your Ice Age arguments? "Prove" greenhouse theories?
Gee whiz, come on, Chief... Did you think Bush "proved" everything in
Philadelphia? How 'bout comparative assessment, ok?
More information about the Mailman