Who Schiros really is/Please understand!

[Tara Tate]

First of all, it would be nice if you had a name.  So far, Schiros has
posted under Gene Barrett, Roid, and now Schiros.  Is this Schiros, yet
again, under wolf's clothing?

First of all, I don't know how else we are supposed to respond to Schiros'
arguments.  His emails are full of slander and foul language (not that I
mind this, but usually they should be attached to some point).

To be rather blunt, the reason why most people on this list adopt a
"chic-leftist-bleeding-heart-doctrine" is because this community is one of
the most intelligent and educated around there.  I wonder if Schiros has
even had a womyn's studies class or a cultural studies class.  There are
individuals on this list ranging from PhD degrees to bachelor degrees to
individuals who just have real live experience about oppression.

Again, I, and others, would love to answer arguments.  However, your post
seems to be rather absent of those as well.

Tara Tate


>From: Schiros Fan Club <schirosfanclub at HOTMAIL.COM>
>Reply-To: Schiros Fan Club <schirosfanclub at HOTMAIL.COM>
>To: EDEBATE at LIST.UVM.EDU
>Subject: Re: Who Schiros really is/Please understand!
>Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 03:16:28 EDT
>
>dude,
>i dont know what youre talking about.  schiros is a great guy.  he has tons
>of friends.  its a shame that you people spend all your time debating and
>arguing over nonsense.  it seems that people get mad at him for being so
>damned right all the time.
>who the fuck is darren elliot?  i dont know, but he sure comes off as
>incredibly articulate and intelligent when his response to schiros' attacks
>boil down to "he jerks off", "people dont like him", and "his mom abandoned
>him".  when you do this he wins, which is inevitable in this case b/c he is
>right.  why does everyone in the debate world have to embrace some
>chic-bleeding-heart-leftist doctrine?  if there is a reason that no one in
>the debate community agrees with schiros (and that is not the case) it is
>b/c the people who do agree with him were smart enough to leave.  i include
>myself among these people.
>if schiros is so wrong, then why dont i see posts that address what he has
>to say, rather than people threatening him and calling him names?  maybe
>there hasnt been enough time for people to respond in this case, but i saw
>the same thing with myn in debate.  whatever.  i just thought i'd stick up
>for my boy and tell you people to shove it.  later
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>http://profiles.msn.com.

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

>From  Wed Sep 13 11:15:05 2000
Message-Id: <WED.13.SEP.2000.111505.0500.>
Received: from LIST.UVM.EDU by LIST.UVM.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with
 spool id 22131 for EDEBATE at LIST.UVM.EDU; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:14:26
 -0400
Precedence: bulk
Received: from wfrpc.dst.fl.us (server.wfrpc.dst.fl.us [206.105.46.100]) by
 list.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA24306 for
 <edebate at list.uvm.edu>; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:14:24 -0400
Received: from TERM-08 (TERM-08 [206.105.46.38]) by wfrpc.dst.fl.us (NTMail
 3.02.09) with ESMTP id da085673 for <edebate at list.uvm.edu>; Wed, 13
 Sep 2000 11:15:06 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d)
Message-ID: <16150645020759 at wfrpc.dst.fl.us>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:15:05 -0500
Reply-To: chismc at WFRPC.DST.FL.US
To: Team Topic Debating in America <EDEBATE at LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: chismc at WFRPC.DST.FL.US
Subject: Re: Who Schiros really is/Please understand!
Comments: To: tara_l_tate at HOTMAIL.COM
In-Reply-To: <F259fHPYD6pR1h8Fw9f0001111b at hotmail.com>

i am 100% down with everything you said and have said in the
past...however, i do not believe that people in america are
oppressed.  i think they are neglected, denied and discriminated
against, but i do not think they are oppressed...just my 2 cents,
but i think oppression has a definite and distinct meaning...