Georgia State University Case List -- Neg

[Mark Schaerrer]

Negative Disclosure Results: Varsity

Arkansas State University
Martin & Willis
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Topicality: Debt relief is not development assistance with a CBO
definition
2.      Cultural linguistic relativism N/U DA: No two cultures have the same
reality, and when the US goes in with a "solution"  there are inevitably
biases embedded within the language that doom policies to failure.  The
African people will be brought into the cultural elite/ivory tower type of
ideology, and the result will be alienation, cultural destruction, and power
struggles.
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
None provided
Cites
None provided

Catholic University
McEachern & Wilson
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Budget
2.      Elections
3.      CP - condition debt relief on reforms
4.      Borders Kritik
5.      Topicality - Greater Horn of Africa
6.      Democracy Promotion Good - they hate it
7.      EU C/P
8.      T - Development assistance
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Government corruption means debt relief doesn't matter
2.      Debt Relief - moral hazard, Africa diverts money to military
Cites
None Provided

Paliseno & Waldinger
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Elections - [unrecognizable] bad, NMD
2.      CP - condition of democratic reforms
3.      Democracy Promotion DA
4.      Civil Society DA
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Topicality - moral hazard
2.      Topicality - corrupt governments
Cites
1.      Elections - Africa News Barber 1998, 9/17
2.      Civil Society - Boad, Journal of Democracy vol 9 no.2 1998
3.      Democracy Promotion - Derryck 1999,
usaid.gov/regions/testimonies/derryck429.htm
Pomorski & Dunn
Off-Case Arguments
1.      T - must be via USAID
2.      Borders K
3.      Elections Bush bad NMD
4.      Budget tradeoff
5.      CP Just HIPC, not debt relief
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Moral hazard T
2.      Aid blaming K  (Tonya Taylor,
www.sas.upenn.edu/african-studies/workshop/tonya98.htm)
Cites

Dartmouth University
Berger & Garen
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Elections
2.      Aid trade-off
3.      T - debt relief not DA
4.      Agent specification
5.      C/P - condition plan on countries not accepting future Aid
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments

Cites

Emory University
Bailey & Ghali
Off-Case Arguments

Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments

Cites

Beckley & Liu
Off-Case Arguments
1.      affirmative is security assistance not development assistance
2.      K - Western colonial LENS is inherently racist (Gordan 1997)
3.      Egypt - sphere of influence is eroded = no support for Middle East peace
4.      Aid Trade off - affirmative costs money = decrease in [unrecognizable]
aid
5.      CP - The USFG will provide assistance to (insert country) by contracting
out NG's to channel (insert plan text here) directly.  The NGO's will be
encouraged to act as service provides as well as utilize their own
empowerment strategies.  A senior official will be designated to coordinate
the efforts of the NGO's and facilitate cooperation and networking between
NGO's.  In addition, NGO's will be encouraged to consult the UN on technical
matters when necessary.  We'll clarify intent.
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
None provided
Cites
None provided

Clough & Rodu
Off-Case Arguments
1.       Budget:  Deal now plan kills GOP support, eco collapse
2.      USAID trade off- Plan trades off with USAID biodiversity, leads to
exinction
3.      T - increase means to augment existing, no aid to Sudan now.
4.      International CRT - plan is a form of racist neo-colonialism

Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Can't solve north south Sudanese conflict (oil, ect..)
2.      factionalism prevents solvency in the south
3.      Khartoum Government blocks humanitarian solvency
4.      aid diversion
Cites
1.      Budget:  IHT 8/8/2000
2.      USAID:  kirschten, editor at national Jnl.  9/99 (gov't executive)

Goodrich & Hudak
Off-Case Arguments
1.      USAID trade-off
2.      USAID T
3.      Development K Alvarez
4.      Japan C/P
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments

Cites

Harkin & Nassredine
Off-Case Arguments
1.    Topicality - DA = USAID
2.    BALBOA = K of white privilege
3.    Fervor DA = plan = DA - infrastructure which increase fervor
4.      DA = structural adjustment, structural adjustment bad
5.      CP - US will relieve its bilateral debt with Rwanda and convince others
to follow
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
None provided
Cites
1.      Solvency - blame Worthington 2000 Toronto Sun,
2.      Warren - Ottawa Citizen 2000
Hendon & Russ
Off-Case Arguments

Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments

Cites

Lynn & Rains
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Conditional NGO Cp: NGO's solve best with military tech that they get on
a contractial basis from the US.  Empowering NGO's Solve for oppression of
women.
2.      Balboa: Assuming that the African people "need" help is racist and sets
up a dichotomy of inferiority.
3.      Budget DA: GOP hates foreign assistance.  Plan passes and angers them so
thay force a government shutdown- the budget doesn't pass.  Destruction of
global economy and nuclear war. (Mead 92).
4.      Egypt Key DA:  Egypt wants leverage from solving horn problems.  Us gets
involved, they don't get the leverage and can't do pollution  policies for
water.  Freshwater supply is critical issue and acatalyst for war.
5.      ASPEC:  must specify a Somalian government in plan
6.      T:  Development assistance is not demining.  Increase means augmenting
existing programs.  Voter for fairness-unfair research burden and
unpredictable ground.
7.      Extra T:  IGAD,
8.      T:  DA
9.      International critical race theory K
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      plan doesn't act everywhere there is mines = moral complicity
2.      corruption plagues African countries.  More aid leads to diversion and
more corruption, which kills credibility of programs and governments leads
to war.
Cites

Mehranbi & Tavery
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Topicality: substantially increase means .7 of Aid
2.      Topicality: gov to gov does not include NGO
3.      Agent specification
4.      Balba - current development ignores voices of Africans (doomed to failure
[cultural imperialism])
5.      Budget - break budget deal impact "Those people and their nukes [i.e.,
mead]
6.      US aid tradeoff - plan trades off with US aid Biodiversity efforts which
risks global catastrophe and overextends US aid and makes it less effective
7.      CP: NGO's
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Western individualism doesn't solve for women
Cites
1.      CNN The World Today - 9/12/2000
2.      IHT CSM 9/5/2000
3.      WT 10/11/1995
4.      Kirschten (ed of Ntl Jrl) 9/99
5.      Fitzburgh (gov't [unrecognizable] Wildlife fund 3/4/99



Louisiana State University
Smith & Mancina
Off-Case Arguments
1.      US AID Budget tradeoff - giving aid to Africa tradeoff with US aid in SE
Asia to combat HIV
2.      Sudan Conflict DA - Sudan is trying to solve, Western action will ?
Islamic Independence, Islamic movement provides empowerment, Islam solves.
3.      Japan Aid CP: Japan will end its support of OLA and provide financial and
technical assistance to SPCMLA and NSCC for local and civic capacity
building, including but not limited to assisting the incorporation of oxen
drawn technology into Agricultural schemes as per Pendergast (sp?)
4.      African Feminism - women K to duret, western influence on Africa
reinforces patriarchy
5.      Cultural Imperialism - US aid to Sudan is imperialistic  because of
Western influence and because AFF is only working with one side of the
current conflict
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
None provided
Cites
1.      Tradeoff: NILS, pres and CEO Ntl Council for International Health 1998
(Federal News Service)
2.      African Feminism: Snyder and Tadesse African Women and Development 1995
3.      Sudan: Esposito, John L.  The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? 1997
4.      Imperialism: ERO 2000

Mercer University
Abbott & Cisneros
Off-Case Arguments
1.      T:  Substantial 2x budget
2.      Fed / Goldilocks (greenspan)
3.      budget to debt relief
4.      Japan c/p
5.      structural adjustment:  Aid policies tied to SAP; SAP leads to Debt;
leads to ethnic backlash
6.      Biodiversity tradeoff
7.      Greenspan DA
8.      Regionalism - emerging in sq.  plan derails; regionalism key to African
peace
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      general USAID fails
2.      Indigenous conflict resolution solves in SQ
Cites

Kenemer & Yrasquin
Off-Case Arguments
1.      China: Resistance of Hegemony
2.      European Union CP: EU will do the plan
3.      Euro Disad
4.      Topicality: not government to government
5.      Clinton: hate crimes legislation
6.      Topicality: not political aid
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      corruption
2.      fungibility
3.      US aid bad
Cites
None provided

Middle Tennessee State University
Bond & Woodward
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Eurohetero Patriarchy K run as Solvency argument.  Thesis is US
assumption of heterosexuality "otherizes" GLB populations - that evils of
patriarchy
2.      Transfer to gay others
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
None provided
Cites
Well, it was "rhetorical" . . .

New York University
Garner and Gorelick
Off-Case Arguments
1.      ASPEC
2.      Dev. Ass => Growth/Markets (topicality)
3.      Escobar
4.      IR Gender
5.      English language (T)
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Development bad stuff
Cites
1.      Escobar
2.      Whitworth (Fem IR Author)
3.      Tomlinson (Cultural Imp. 1991)

Redlands University
Albiniak & Brown
Off-Case Arguments
1.      T:  not within budget constraint of development assistance
2.      spending:  now spending snowballs > increase inflation, mead 98
3.      spaceballs:  targets the non-state areas within the "Africa State" any
action within the African state boost oppression.
4.      c/p:  do plan as relief assistance and not do plan w/o any aid to Africa
States
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.  cooperation with African stateleads to increase support for military and
increases AIDS
Cites
1.      Spaceballs:  Mutus, mid jrnl intl law, summer 95


Samford University
Ezekial & Rivers
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Debt relief not development assistance
2.      Colonialism K
3.      Elections
4.      Kill African Unity
5.      Shunning K
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Kill African Unity
Cites
None provided

Radford & South
Off-Case Arguments
1.      MNC's exploit Africa through foreign aid
2.      Humanitarian aid c/p Within the IGAD humanitarian aid will be provided
for southern Sudanese efforts at self-determination by backing
implementation and supervision of self det.
3.      elections:  close race now.  Gets bush elected NMD is deployed
4.      T:  development assistance excludes peace keeping efforts
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments

Cites

University of Alabama
Mills & Phillips
Off-Case Arguments

Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments

Cites

University of Georgia
Carr & McGrath
Off-Case Arguments
1.      T:  development assistance is budget category
2.      CP - Humanitarian Assistance
3.      USAID Crunch biodiversity stable now. New pressure on USAID cuts
biodiversity funding.
4.      Elections  Bush bad.  ABM
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Use of state must be justified.
2.      postmod theory flawed
3.      adding women don't solve
4.      existence of subordination key for movements to moblize - deny agency
5.      cooperative ventures a sham
6.      knowledge doesn't lead to individualization

Cites

Keane & Ranew
Off-Case Arguments
1.      T - Development assistance, Extra
2.      Humanitarian c/p
3.      USAID Crunch
4.      Development K
5.      Territorial Visocsity - borders with nomadic thought implications and
alternative
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Narratives turn  ogundipe-leslie 94, re-creating ourselves: African women
and critical transformation
2.      mainstream gender bad.  Baden and Goetz 98
3.      Western solves Paternalistic  Parpart 95
4.      representations of African women essentialist   udayagiri  95
Cites
1.      Elections link - Hoy 98
2.      USAID Crunch - Fitzhugh 3-30-2000 (lexis,wwf)
Kelley & Ramachandrappa
Off-Case Arguments
1.      CP - Humanitarian Assistance
2.      Thompson Rider DA
3.      Spending/Eco DA
4.      Development K
5.      Topicality Development Assistance - Budget Category
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Militarism
2.      US not culpable
3.      No morality
Cites
None provided

Nolley & Parekh
Off-Case Arguments
1.      T:  existing must increase
2.      USAID T/O - biodiversity
3.      Elections.  Bush bad. NMD
4.      themson rider  add to plan
5.      c/p executive / earmarking.  NB flexibility of pres.
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Devecepment discourse
2.      Genocide Triv
Cites

University of Kentucky
Aiken & Westmoreland
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Clinton - ABM shell
2.      Middle East Budget trade-off DA
3.      Turasi DA
4.      Consult NATO c/p

Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments

Cites

University of South Carolina
Bailey & McAllister
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Cultural Imperialism
2.      Japan c/p w/ mori credibility net benefit
3.      T - DA doesn't include landmines
4.      T - GHA means all within the GH
5.      Budget T/O

Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments

Cites

University of Southern California
Faith & Silber
Off-Case Arguments
1.      UN c/p
2.      PNTR - Clinton - NTR good.  Clinton needs cap to save it
3.      Development K  Sustainable Development is a tool for western development
4.      Aid trade off
5.      Agent specification
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.  Development K arguments
Cites
1.  Development.  Wolfgong Sachs, global ecology 1993

Garret & Vail
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Topicality - development assistance must help poor
2.      CP - US fed gov't conditions debt relief on poverty reduction
3.      Shunning
4.      NGO Disad - aid is declining in status quo - plan gives aid, which harms
north/south NGO cooperation - not solvent plus IS D/A
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
None provided
Cites
1.      NGO - Maltora 2000, Third World Quarterly vol 21 #4
2.      Shunning - US State Department www.state.gov

Kephhart & Wolderman
Off-Case Arguments
1.      X-T plan consults for peace not DA
2.      Capitalism
3.      NTR
4.      Tradeoff - increase Development Assistance and decrease debt relief
5.      Shunning
6.      CP: US federal gov't with direct referrendum
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Quick fixes do not work
2.      No solvency - conflict is inevitable
3.      No solvency - no one will listen
4.      Remining
5.      Government risks kill
Cites
1.      Capitalism - CHLA 2000 (LN Law Rev)
2.      Clinton - CSM 9/6/00 (push NTR)
3.      Aid Tradeoff - AFP 7/13/00

University of West Georgia
Goodwin & Krasielwicz
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Japan CP - they do it
2.      Clinton- peace process
3.      Aid Trade off
4.      Topicality - money is not development assistance
5.      tourism
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1.      Food aid bad - diversion, opposition, dependency
2.      Tourism
Cites
None provided
Vanderbilt University
Holman & Rosen
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Pax Americana K - externalizing violence and upholding the state centric
model of problem/solution guarantees the Western logic of capitalist
exploitation and securitization
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1. HIV/AIDS harms - racist, based on the hyper-sexualized African
Cites
1.      Pax Americana - Johnson 2000
2.      HIV/AIDS - Geshekter 1999

Wake Forest University
Eaton & Speice
Off-Case Arguments
1.      Topicality - including means that must do more than government to
government assistance
2.      Sacred cow
3.      Development
4.      Coercion - taxation link
5.      Unearmarking CP  - the DA that is earmarked under the plan will be placed
in an unearmarked account to be administered by the president.  The
president will use the aid for what the plan mandates, unless he determines
that a crisis demands that the funds should be used to solve that
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
1. AID diversion
Cites
1.      development link - Uvin 1998 Aiding Violence: The Development Enterprise
in Rwanda
2.      Sacred cow link - not provided

Enzer & Kneupper
Off-Case Arguments
1.      T - gov to gov, substantially =25% increase
2.      Coercion / Objectivism
3.      Executive discretion c/p
4.      Diversion - aid gets diverted which leads to social / political chaos
Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments
Aid bad cards
Cites

Will & Yopp
Off-Case Arguments

Major Case Turns and Solvency Arguments

Cites
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.