[eDebate] emendation 2 congdon reply concerning UT debate

[kevin kuswa]

strew-be,

one question i had that might help follow what you call "a different path
of questioning" is about your views of the school, particularly graduate
school.

when you were considering graduate school at ut (or elsewhere) what
was it about the academic institution that attracted you?  If you had
decided to go to graduate school, would it have been in order to coach
the team and make some money for it?  would it have been primarily
for some non-debate related reason?  why communication studies?
and, do you think the only way to work with debate at the collegiate
level is through attending school?

what happened with your motions to work at the free debate cooperative?

finally, is ut really the pinnacle of foucauldian hypocrisy or do you have
more first-hand knowledge with which to express yourself in terms of ut?
what about all that is ut debate that is between and beyond you,
myself, or any other single individual?  are you speaking for/to/at all ut
debaters, or simply those you have had personal contact with (limited
or extensive).?

keep in mind i think this is best stuff hashed out backchannel, but your
references to edebate as some sort of arbiter (sp?) force my questioning
to start here.

kevin