[eDebate] Debate School Upsets in the NCAA BB Tourney
Thu Mar 14 14:00:42 CST 2002
My apologies to the Bears and to my friends at Pitt. I just overlooked that
match-up by mistake. I do have both Cal and Pitt in the second round, but I
give the nod to Pitt to go on to the Sweet 16. Sorry. Youth is often
over-rated in the Big Dance. If I'm wrong, I owe Luskey a drink at the NDT.
>From: "Randy Luskey" <randyluskey at hotmail.com>
>To: "DARREN ELLIOTT" <elliottdarren at hotmail.com>, <edebate at ndtceda.com>
>Subject: Re: [eDebate] Debate School Upsets in the NCAA BB Tourney
>Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 02:57:25 -0800
> Darren's NCAA breakdown was pretty solid except that he left one debate
>school off his list that will easily roll its way into the Sweet 16. Look
>out for the CAL Bears baby. . . third in the big bad Pac-10 this year with
>bunch of youngsters that can shoot the three ball. And let's not forget
>Ralph Sampson's nephew in the low post. We will show Penn why they don't
>belong in the tournament in the first place in round one before we
>Pittsburg (you heard me, Omri) in the second round in front of their home
>crowd. Go Bears. . .
>eDebate mailing list
>eDebate at ndtceda.com
>To subscribe, UNSUBSCRIBE, and see the subscriber list, go here:
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
More information about the Mailman