[eDebate] New LPW

[Darren Elliott]

Thanks Josh.  Those critics and so many more people at those tournaments
did such a wonderful job welcoming this new program and new students to the
activity.  Good work to you for lightening the mood on the list with the
LPW.  Funny stuff!

Chief

At 12:18 AM 10/2/2002 -0700, Josh Martin wrote:
>Hey -- look at this. Something to distract you from those iraq cards, or
>not if you're above all of that, you K reading slime.
>
>You can find the new edition of Low Point Win at:
>http://www.newwavebriefs.com/lowpointwin/lpw.html
>
>Like always.
>
>We've got a few new contributors this week, which was pretty good. *thanks*
>There's a couple articles we'll probably put up later in the week so look
>out for that if you're interested. 
>
>I was really touched by Chief's email to the list. That stuff is true, I
>think. My biggest pet peeve in the world is people who get assigned to
>judge junior or novice rounds and don't take it seriously. Those people
>deserve your attention too. Be an educator. Be an interested observer. Be
>whatever you want, but be a good person. So double saluts to those critics
>who did their *jobs* and salut to Chief's debaters because there's nothing
>more annoying than a debater who ignores the rfd talk. Here's a tip: write
>stuff down.
>
>The people who judge debates are pretty smart, by and large. 
>
>Here's something else: I went to an actual debate tournament a while ago
>and was completely surprised by the amount of people who were like "low
>point win kicks ass" etcetera. I never knew. So thanks to all you folks,
>everyone else: hope you're having a good week.
>
>Josh Martin
>
>_______________________________________________
>eDebate mailing list
>eDebate at ndtceda.com
>To subscribe, UNSUBSCRIBE, and see the subscriber list, go here:
>http://ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
>
>