[eDebate] Bush Using Queers as Wedge Issue

[Christopher Cooper]

I think you're starting to read MY column of YOUR flow.
 
MY argument is that the state should not be in the marriage business.  But,
that once it decides to confer benefits on people who "couple" - those
benefits should apply equally to all citizens regardless of sexual
orientation, affinity...whatever....AND, more importantly, MY argument is
that it is within the purview of the SC to FORCE states to apply those
benefits equally under the 14th amendment to the constitution.
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Martlno4 at aol.com [mailto:Martlno4 at aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:11 PM
To: ccooper at planning.org
Cc: edebate at ndtceda.com
Subject: Re: [eDebate] Bush Using Queers as Wedge Issue


In a message dated 7/30/2003 4:09:00 PM Eastern Standard Time,
ccooper at planning.org writes:



Overheard - Martino's partner whispering to him:
  
"Dude...you're 2NR made no sense."
  
Judges go for a cigarette.




Coop your argument is that this one particular regulation on marriage should
be lifted, because YOU think it should be. What about the regulations? Why
not lift those, because YOU dont hink they should be, hmm I wonder if that
is a product of your JudeoChristian upbringing.

NM 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20030730/2dd8561f/attachment.html