[eDebate] Kudos to The Court
GatorDebate at aol.com
GatorDebate
Thu Jun 26 14:09:33 CDT 2003
In a message dated 6/26/2003 2:13:49 PM Eastern Standard Time, Martlno4
writes:
> Frank this comment shows your tunnel vision view of this subject. This case
> was not about homosexuals, even though the specific instance that prompted
> it was. Sodomy laws cover hetero and homo sexuals, and this country
> arbitrarily limits sexual behavior in all sorts of ways, why not anal sex?
>
If you don't think that Sodomy laws are used primarily as a way of limiting
gay sex than I can understand why you don't see a need for the court to take up
the issue.
frank
***************************************************
Frank P. Irizarry
Debate Coach/Lecturer/Doctoral Student
University of Florida
Center for Written and Oral Communication
413 Rolfs Hall
PO Box 112032
Gainesville, FL 32611-2032
Tel: 352-392-5421 (Office)
Tel: 386-216-3193 (Cell)
Fax: 352-392-5420
Gatordebate at aol.com
***************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20030626/9cf04365/attachment.htm
More information about the Mailman
mailing list