[eDebate] Re: Fwd: Shirley Out Round Scouting

[Jean Paul Lacy]

Caveat: we tried to provide a brief synopsis of what went on in each of the 
elim rounds, so that those who were absent could have some clue about what 
went down.

Our synopses clearly miss a great deal of the complexity and nuance of each 
debate round. Scouting is never complete, and given our limited resources 
on elim day we figured that a few sentence summary of each debate/rfd would 
be most helpful.

If anyone has further details they would like to add, please do so.

--JP
lacyjp at wfu.edu

At 09:55 PM 11/22/2003 -0500, Jean Paul Lacy wrote:

>>Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 21:05:00 -0500
>>From: Patrick Waldinger <waldpe3 at wfu.edu>
>>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425
>>X-Accept-Language: en,zh-TW,zh-CN,zh,ja,ko,tr,ru
>>To: "Lacy, JP" <lacyjp at wfu.edu>
>>Subject: Out Round Scouting
>>X-Virus-Scanned: by Sophos Anti-Virus (http://www.sophos.com)
>>
>>Some, naturally, are more complete than others. We have some info from 
>>every round except the Semis debate between Northwestern LM (aff) and 
>>Berkeley SS (neg). We know that Berkeley went for and won on their 
>>Counterplan but we have no idea what it did or what the net benefits 
>>were. We also don't have any info about the Doubles since we did not have 
>>the wherewithal nor the good sense to obtain this data. Perhaps we should 
>>encourage people to send it to us. I do not have an edebate account so if 
>>you could post this, that would be great. Thanks,
>>
>>Dinger
>>
>>
>>
>>