[eDebate] RNC whistleblowa: kerry won by 1.7 mil

[Jack Stroube]

adios gestapo queens --- the RNC is more concerned than u r b/c u suck///

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MEN412A.html

Voter Fraud in Florida and Ohio: 

Kerry Won the Election by at least 1,7 Million Votes

by Brad Menfil

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/11/303775.shtml ? 27 Nov 2004

www.globalresearch.ca ? 3 December 2004

The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MEN412A.html  


Brad Menfil is not my real name. I work for the RNC. I fear reprisals if I'm found out.

The truth about this election is this: Florida and Ohio had to go for Bush in order for him 
to "win" the election. In reality he lost both states. In fact, he did not even win the 
popular vote. He lost the national popular vote by at least 1,750,000. This shows you 
the scale of the fraud.


The exit polls were not wrong. Kerry was the clear winner, but victory was snatched 
from him.

Florida first. The 200,000+ margin of victory for Bush made this state uncontestable. 
Everybody assumes that even with some fraud, Kerry could never have made up the 
difference in a recount. But Kerry actually won by about 750,000 votes. The numbers 
were changed by a computer program (in both electronic and scan-tron voting systems) 
called "KerryLite." "KerryLite" of course is not actual name of the program. The actual 
name is 11-5-18-18 etc. For additional encryption, the numbers were jumbled but I'm 
not sure in which order. The numbers replace the letters of the alphabet. For example, K 
is the eleventh letter of the alphabet.

So the if-then statement goes something like this: "if total true Kerry>total true Bush, 
Bush x 1.04x (.04 is a random number)(total true Kerry), total true Bush". The second 
part of the equation takes the total number of votes cast and subtracts the new Bush 
total, subtracts the third party totals and leaves the rest for Kerry.

Sometimes the program would also reduce third party votes and award them to Bush. 
And even where Bush legitimately won, he was still awarded additional votes. The big 
Democratic counties (Broward for example) went to Kerry because it had to appear that 
everything was on the up and up. It's interesting to see this unfold. Does anybody 
wonder why the Republican counties were mostly counted after the Democratic 
counties? You should wonder, and also know that this was no accident. The Bush team 
had to make up the votes as the night went on.

In Ohio, computer voting fraud, vote tossing and voter suppression were the main 
methods. Vote tossing was simply the removal of Kerry votes and some third party 
votes. In some areas, the Bush vs. Kerry votes were absurd. Nine to one, eight to two.

Voter suppression took the form of making voters stand in four hour long lines. This of 
course took place in Democratic areas. The simplest thing to do was to have too few 
voting machines. Sometimes that's all it takes. People eventually lose patience and leave 
without casting a vote.

In other states such as New Mexico, Nevada, Iowa and New Hampshire, Kerry's leads 
evaporated very quickly once the polls were shut down. Kerry only won New Hampshire, 
but barely. As it turned out, the lead was 6% for Kerry in that state and not enough 
fraudulent activity took place to flip the state to Bush.

So this will all come out and be known to everyone. Nothing this massive can be kept a 
secret. You're already beginning to see these "irregularities" and the whisper will 
become a roar.

http://www.ndtceda.com
Phallus Jerkins Dabait League