[eDebate] NDT: right track?
Zompetti at aol.com
Fri Apr 8 15:25:42 CDT 2005
You're absolutely right about what you say below, Charles. The members of
the NDT committee are posted publicly and are available for you to pursue (I'm
one of them). Anyone can come to the meetings to provide their input (Duck
does it all of the time, and frequently offers arguments that the committee
wouldn't otherwise consider).
The CSTV deal was a discussion that spanned multiple NDT committee meetings.
The District chairs for each district are on the committee and should be
reporting to their respective districts. In theory, there was ample time for
"community" discussion. I know the system isn't perfect, but the meetings and
agenda items aren't "secret." I would encourage you and others to actively
discuss issues with your district chairs and come to the meetings.
Incidentally, the NDT sponsorship issue is unrelated to the NDT committee --
that is a Board of Trustees issue, which doesn't have the same access to the
community as does the NDT committee.
In a message dated 4/8/2005 2:17:00 P.M. Central Standard Time,
olneyce at gmail.com writes:
But we're not powerless; if the "public taping" clause
permits something which people don't want, maybe we should consider
altering it. The NDT is not a mindless bureaucracy thousands of
layers apart from us which we can't hope to change, only to live with.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mailman