[eDebate] A remark on the Roe discussion
Tue Apr 11 11:49:12 CDT 2006
Remember the treaties topic when CEDAW was on the ballot but didn't win? I
don't remember anyone shouting that going neg against a pro-women's rights
treaty would deeply offend their sensibilities. I do remember someone on my
squad advocating for one of the smaller lists by saying that debating about
women's issues would be too boring and irrelevant. I don't know how sexist
debate is, but I'd rather be able to talk about it for more than 3 heated
days on edebate and perhaps use a Roe v Wade (or some other abortion case
for that matter) in debates to explore these issues.
I almost wrote a very vehement letter in favor of including Roe. I'm not
going to claim any right to speak based on my identity, but I believe that
limiting debate is never good, and everything should be a potential topic.
Reading Mein Kampf didn't make me a Nazi and voting to overturn Roe v Wade
won't make me Ann Coulter. If I thought it would, I'd put in my judge
philosophy that I wouldn't vote for it. Don't censor the community if the
matter is personal advocacy. Allow everyone the opportunity to find a
meaningful way to participate in an activity we all dearly love.
And the standard caveat, I don't speak for any institution, only myself.
Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
More information about the Mailman