Joseph Carver carrolltondebate
Fri Apr 7 08:26:50 CDT 2006

On 4/7/06, Spmancuso at aol.com <Spmancuso at aol.com> wrote:
> What this rule does do is tell a relatively small group of people that for
> three or four days (out of 365) they can't research or write arguments

So the best argument for the rule is that it  has little to no impact? I
think that this post is an example of conceding too much ground to get out
of offense. You can't mitigate all of the concerns that Tim, Scott, Zomp and
Lupo post without also obliterating any solvency claims the new rule has.

Joe Carver
Carrollton Debate
Division 1 Supporter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20060407/3480ed07/attachment.htm 

More information about the Mailman mailing list