[eDebate] ???Overturning Roe v Wade????
nrichter at umsis.miami.edu
Mon Apr 10 13:14:04 CDT 2006
It seems quite telling that you respond to real concerns about this community,
particularily to two womyn by calling them "childish." Enough said.
Quoting Paul Strait <paulstrait at hotmail.com>:
> Bracket off the fact that no one has attempted at all to answer the arg
> by Rubino and Hester that if Aff's have to overturn Roe v. Wade, it
> also mean they have to advocate a pro-life position.
> Also, bracket off the argument made by many that this is an extremely
> salient political issue and it is telling that people are afraid to
> both sides of it. (And the idea that Roe v. Wade is equivalent to Brown
> Board of Education of Topeka is one of the offensive thing I have heard
> edebate since Matt Schiros was around, and a total slap in the face to
> pro-life feminists as well as people of color).
> The way that this complaint has been made just seems childish to me. It
> almost sounds like people would be willing to hijack debate if they
> get their way. "if the topic that I don't want wins, I just won't
> or "if the topic that I don't want wins, as a judge I will always vote
> Aff/neg." Grow up.
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at ndtceda.com
More information about the Mailman