[eDebate] korcok's position on 1% doctrine
Sun Jul 9 19:52:36 CDT 2006
who cares if liberal bloggers represented 1% doctrine as risk analysis when
it really has to do with security threats?
the first point was 1% doctrine is a hyper paranoid view that warrants
killing innocent civilians in iraq for no reason. for example, the 5
rapers and murderers recently accused will make the 1% doctrine as a layer
of deniability in their case. there is 1% chance that any civilian in iraq
is a terrorist so mucking up more collateral damage in a guerilla war is ok.
the second point was 1% is such a low threshold for war that it makes
debates about WMDs and any other justification for war irrelevant. the 1%
doctrine is a strong executive/anti-public debate doctrine. the iraq war
you took your response off into la la land and never got to ross's applied
arguments on the 1% doctrine, good job correcting the liberal blogs. do
you have anything about the edebate applications?
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
More information about the Mailman