[eDebate] FW: core-cock c-x

Michael Korcok mmk_savant
Wed Jun 14 09:45:44 CDT 2006

From: mmk_savant at hotmail.comTo: infracaninophile at hotmail.comSubject: RE: [eDebate] core-cock c-xDate: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:42:22 -0400

i see you are upset, assjack.  long bus trip home?so many questions without answers.  it couldn't be that your understanding of the world is screwed beyond repair, could it?might that be at least part of the answer, assjack? Michael Korcok

> From: infracaninophile at hotmail.com> To: edebate at ndtceda.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:27:26 -0500> CC: jvreedmore at hotmail.com> Subject: [eDebate] core-cock c-x> > mr. born again christian neocon,> > if truthout lost again, then why do they not feel the need to out their > sources on the story?  pandering the bad source line?   rove implanted the > story against himself to screw the lefties?   scroll down to the middle of > the page to hear leopold, yesterday, wife beater:> > http://www.bigeddieradio.com/dailyAudio/index.asp> > seems like if leopold/truthout lost, they would have to yield to your bogus > truth and admit defeat to retain journalistic credibility.> > perhaps, great nazi lover of a too strong executive branch, the porcine > operative cut and run on old dick cheney.   best scenario for you at this > point is that he guarantees libby's jail time but looks more like cheney > given that sunday wash post article few weeks back on dickhead's "junket" > annotation in the margin (released by fitzgerald, dumbass).> > remember, the murray waas article recently posted to edabait concerning > ashcroft's late ass recusal or are you still smokin honkey house neocon > crack?> > well, mainstream media lover, long ago before the first of FIVE grand jury > testimonies, your cool cutthroat master of undermining the democratic > process was already busted for a cover up:> > http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0608nj1.htm> > "Rove's version was strikingly similar to the one from Libby, who had also > been a source for reporters about Plame. Libby's version to the FBI was that > in telling reporters that Plame worked for the CIA and may have played a > role in sending Wilson to Niger, he was merely passing on unsubstantiated > rumors that he had heard from other reporters. But the indictment of Libby > alleges that he lied about this, and instead was told about Plame by Cheney, > an undersecretary of State, and at least two other government officials.> > As National Journal reported recently, investigators further believed -- > based on the timing of phone calls between Rove and Novak, and on other > evidence -- that the Bush adviser and the columnist may have devised a cover > story to conceal Rove's role in leaking information about Plame to Novak. > Investigators were so concerned about this possibility that Ashcroft > received a briefing specifically on that one topic, according to people > familiar with those briefings."> > why don't you attack murray waas' credibility too?  he is an opposing > journalist.   that's the neocon way -- shoot the messenger, right little > cock?> > billmon has this to say:> > "If Murray Waas is right (and he usually is) and the FBI agents who > initially interviewed Rove and their superiors both believed the evil one > bore false witness -- and so notified the Attorney General of the United > States -- then it's not very plausible that Patrick Fitzgerald would decide, > after sweating Rove five times in front of a grand jury, that it was all > just an honest mistake. And the theory, currently being peddled by the naifs > at New York Times, that Fitz relented because of allegedly exculpatory > testimony from Rove's own mouthpiece doesn't even pass the laugh test."> > i like the "no deal' proclamation from team nazi.   you buyin that crap too. >    remember they aren't journalists just lawyers.  nice publication of the > exciulpation letter from team nazi.   i like it.  hiding behind pig's skin.  >     i like this echo of what i have been saying:> > http://journals.democraticunderground.com/CrisisPapers/25> > "It may just turn out that Rove was so desperate to escape the likelihood of > incarceration that he made a deal with Fitzgerald. He gets to walk away if > he testifies against Scooter, and tells what he knows about Cheney and maybe > even Bush, among others.> > That certainly is one way to interpret the Rove news this morning. The other > is that Fitzgerald simply didn't think he could make the charges stick > against Rove and felt obliged to cut him loose.> > If I were a betting man, I'd put my money on the former interpretation, or > maybe even a combination of the two. Even just judging from news reporting > on this story, it would appear that an open-and-shut case had been made for > charging Rove with, at the very least, perjury and obstruction of justice. > Whether or not Fitzgerald was convinced he could make the case stand up in > court, he may have convinced Rove that conviction was pretty much a > slam-dunk.> > Rove's lawyer won't release the text of Fitzgerald's letter that reportedly > gives his client a walk. It's possible there are hints in the actual text > indicating why Rove is free to go: on condition that he cooperate with the > ongoing investigation, that sort of thing.> > "SEALED VS. SEALED"> > Which brings us to Jason Leopold's story Monday that asserted, with far less > bravado than his previous "scoop" weeks ago announcing Rove's "indictment," > the likelihood that the indictment had been under seal for nearly five > weeks. Leopold even supplied the title under which the likely indictment was > kept secret ("Sealed vs. Sealed") and a case number ( "06 cr 128").> > Hardly anyone was willing to publish that story. Was Leopold full of crap > (again), many editors and bloggers mused? Or is there a more complicated, > and compelling, interpretation?> > Here's mine: If indeed Rove was told that a sealed indictment had been > issued for his arrest in the case, it's possible that Fitzgerald used that > scary fact as added inducement to Bush's chief political advisor to use this > last chance to cut a deal. Rove, seeing the likely prison handwriting on the > wall, made the deal, which took weeks of detailed discussions between Rove's > team and> Fitzgerald to work out."> > let's hear more cheers for team nazi from born again christian lover.   > let's hear more mainstream media quotations that really go deep into the > matter.   let's celebrate karl rove, the great cheater, underminer of > elections and any process democratic and now great ratfucker to bring down > lawless dickhead cheney.   and finally let's hear all the great cut and run > news from iraq and how many more innocent civilian terrorists korcok loves > to see murdered and how many more nazi soldiers he neo-conned into an > unnecessary death...long live the christian blood cult, death to sand > niggers and their guerilla resistance of imperialism!!! the words of the > great nazi core-cock himself!!!> > _________________________________________________________________> Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! > http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/> 

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20060614/0ae8181c/attachment.html 

More information about the Mailman mailing list