[eDebate] confidential house dabait memo

Jake Stromboli infracaninophile
Sun Jun 18 10:31:41 CDT 2006

here's the text.  the situation is bleak.  i mean fucking bleak, folks.  
never as a dabait coach or dabaiter have you seen such degneneration in the 
congress.  it looks like the al-zarqawi murder was staged to have just one 
positive current event to report during the "da bait".   who wrote it, 
cheney or rove?  i think it was cheney b/c of the continued idea that saddam 
participated in 9/11:


Confidential Messaging Memo ? Floor Debate on Iraq and the Global War on 
To: House Republican Members

From: House Majority Leader John A. Boehner

Date: June 13, 2006

Re: Confidential Messaging Memo ? Floor Debate on Iraq and the Global War on 

This week, the House of Representatives will engage in a debate about the 
war in Iraq, the Global War on Terror and our efforts to strengthen our 
national security in a post-9/11 world.

The past week has brought news of several important, positive developments 
in Iraq and the Global War on Terror:

? U.S. military forces eliminated the terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, 
al-Qaeda?s top commander in Iraq and a cold-blooded killer.

? The Iraqi government named new interior, defense and security ministers as 
part of the new government?s continued progress.

? Just this morning, President George W. Bush traveled to Baghdad to meet 
the newly appointed Prime Minster of Iraq, Nouri al-Maliki and to discuss 
our growing partnership with the new democratic ally.

Clearly, these positive developments are the result of steadfast support of 
both our military and diplomatic efforts in Iraq and across the globe. We 
should not refrain from touting such progress

During this debate, our Republican Conference should be focused on 
delivering these key points:

The Importance of Our Actions

It is imperative during this debate that we re-examine the conditions that 
required the United States to take military action in Afghanistan and Iraq 
in the aftermath of the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The attacks we witnessed that day serve as a reminder of the dangers we face 
as a nation in a post-9/11 world. We can no longer expect oceans between us 
and our enemies to keep us safe. The plotting and planning taking place in 
terror camps protected by rogue regimes could no longer go unchecked or 
unchallenged. In a post-9/11 world, we could no longer allow despots and 
dictators like the Taliban and Saddam Hussein to ignore international 
sanctions and resolutions passed by the United Nations Security Council.

So, during this debate we must make clear to the American people that the 
United States had to take action in the best interests of the security of 
our nation and the world community. As Republicans who supported military 
action against Saddam Hussein and terrorists around the globe, the United 
States had to show our resolve as the world?s premier defender of freedom 
and liberty before such ideals were preyed upon, rather than after standing 
witness to their demise at the hands of our enemies.

As President John F. Kennedy once stated so eloquently:

?The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it. And 
one path we shall never choose, and that is the path of surrender, or 

A Portrait of Contrasts

This debate in the House of Representatives gives our Republican Conference 
the opportunity to present the American people our case for strong national 
security policies whose purpose is to protect the nation against another 
attack on our own soil.

Similarly, we must conduct this debate as a portrait of contrasts between 
Republicans and Democrats with regard to one of the most important political 
issues of our era. Articulating and advocating our core principles will 
allow the American public to witness Members of Congress debate a 
fundamental question facing America?s leaders:

In a post-9/11 world, do we confront dangerous regimes and the threat of 
terrorism with strength and resolve, or do we instead abandon our efforts 
against these threats in the hopes that they will just fade away on their 

Republicans believe victory in Iraq will be an important blow to terrorism 
and the threat it poses around the world. Democrats, on the other hand, are 
prone to waver endlessly about the use of force to protect American ideals. 
Capitol Hill Democrats? only specific policy proposals are to concede defeat 
on the battlefield and instead, merely manage the threat of terrorism and 
the danger it poses.

These are troubling policies to embrace in a post-9/11 world. During this 
debate, we need to clarify just how wrong the Democrats? weak approach is 
and just how dangerous their implementation would be to both the short-term 
and long-term national security interests of the United States.

Resolve Will Triumph Over Retreat

As a result of our efforts during this debate, Americans will recognize that 
on the issue of national security, they have a clear choice between a 
Republican Party aware of the stakes and dedicated to victory, versus a 
Democrat Party without a coherent national security policy that sheepishly 
dismisses the challenges America faces in a post- 9/11 world.

Let there be no doubt that America and its allies in the war in Iraq and the 
Global War on Terrorism face difficult challenges. The American people are 
understandably concerned about our mission in a post-Saddam Iraq. There have 
been many tough days since Iraq?s liberation and transition to a sovereign 

Democrats are all too eager to seize upon the challenges we face as their 
rationale or motivation for retreat. As Republicans, we understand the 
diplomatic and national security hazards of such a move. We must echo the 
American public?s understanding of just how great the stakes are in Iraq and 
our long-term efforts to win the War on Terrorism.

Building democracies in a part of the world that has known nothing but 
tyranny and despotism is a difficult task. But achieving victory there and 
gaining democratic allies in the region will be the best gift of security we 
can give to future generations of Americans.

On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to 
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

More information about the Mailman mailing list