[eDebate] topic thoughts - replies to various posts

James Lyle jrlyle
Tue Jun 13 19:02:36 CDT 2006


There are several answers to the concern about NDT-eligible rounds:

1. Irrelevant to novice/jv debate.  Novice/JV debate is as important, if not
more.

2. This is an important question for ADA schools to ask themselves, not sure
the CEDA topic committee should use this as a reason to not allow a
resolutional reconsideration.

3. Catholic solves - run "separate tournaments" - ADA = n/jv, open = CEDA.

4. ADA teams can go to CEDA tournaments.

5. Not sure many non-ADA schools are bringing debaters to ADA tournaments to
get them into the NDT.  Yes, some do, but not many.




Mike says:

I think the concern instead would be for ADA schools that would like to go
to the NDT. This section of the NDT bylaws indicate that it must be the CEDA
or
 NDT topic and only those rounds count:

 b. Eligible teams: To submit for the bid allocation process, a team must
have paid their NDT subscription fee and have either (1) a minimum of 18
intercollegiate preliminary rounds on the fall CEDA topic or its NDT topic
parallel
either both as individuals or as a team of varsity or open debate in at
least three tournaments, each consisting of a minimum of 6 preliminary
rounds
with at least 6 teams from at least four different schools in varsity or
open
division, or (2) one member of the team with a minimum of 32 intercollegiate

preliminary rounds on the fall CEDA topic or its NDT topic parallel in at
least
four tournaments, each consisting of a minimum of six preliminary rounds,
with at least six teams from at least four different schools in varsity or
open
division (i.e., if one member of the team has at least 32 rounds satisfying
the above requirements, no minimum number of rounds is required of the
partner in order for the team to be eligible for the bid allocation
process).

My worry is that teams would avoid tournaments if those rounds would not
count towards NDT requirements for bid allocation and second round bids.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20060613/46c3bfc0/attachment.htm 



More information about the Mailman mailing list