[eDebate] JV/Novice Nationals

Josh Hoe jbhdb8
Wed Mar 8 23:04:26 CST 2006

There is no official sanction for the JV Nats tournament - people just
called the tournament currently at WK and the tournament at JCCC
nationals.....ADA is an organization witha  national tournament, CEDA is an
organization with a national tournament.....NDT is an organization whose
mandate is the national tournament.  CEDA has no jurisdiction over any of
the other tournaments.


On 3/9/06, Joe Patrice <joepatrice at gmail.com> wrote:
>  I'm just going to focus on the concept of the CEDA leadership intervening
> in this matter.  I cannot speak for the rest of the ole executive branch,
> but I don't think this fits within the powers of the CEDA executive.
> First of all, two of the "National" tournaments on the schedule are ADA
> and the NDT...while a blatant CEDA power grab would fulfill a certain
> megalomaniacal vision of CEDA's future (come on...one of us self-identifies
> as "Chief"...you have to see world domination coming), I don't think anyone
> thinks CEDA can tell ADA and the NDT to stop having their tournaments.
> So, beyond CEDA Nats, can CEDA dictate what tournaments call themselves
> "Nationals?"  I think that also goes beyond the Constitution.  Perhaps an
> amendment is necessary to provide the executive the role of accrediting a
> JV/Novice National tournament, but I don't see that power there now.
> And I would argue that I'm leaning toward this being a power that CEDA
> should not have.  If your proposal is that one location should be designated
> as the sole JV/Novice national tournament, that would best realize the word
> "national" but I think it could be counterproductive to what we're hoping to
> accomplish with JV/Novice Nats.  For a variety of reasons, most JV/Novice
> squads are not in a position to fly their debaters all over the country for
> one tournament.  Many JV/Novice programs have small budgets, many JV/Novice
> programs have 4 or 5 teams they want to travel to these tournaments, many
> have open teams too and need to balance their budget to travel to these
> tournaments AND CEDA Nats (and some to the NDT) and certainly that would be
> difficult for us to afford if CEDA dictated that THE novice national
> tournament was the Sac State JV/Novice nats.  While it is not perhaps
> "National" the current structure of 3 "Super-Regional" championships (West,
> Middle, East) that allow cross-over maximizes the national feel without
> sacrificing one geographical set of teams to the altar of defining a single
> national tournament (and I say 3 because, despite its title, I think we can
> all agree that this thread is not focusing on Northwestern tournament, whose
> eligibility rules make it more accurately "Frosh Nationals" or "TOC Part 2:
> The Quickening").
> To conclude, I do not think this is an area for CEDA leadership
> intervention and I would argue strongly against dictating one tournament as
> the sole JV/Novice Nationals because that necessarily leads to some novice
> teams having nowhere to go.
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at ndtceda.com
> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20060309/e916a527/attachment.htm 

More information about the Mailman mailing list