[eDebate] the rove indictment
Wed May 24 08:35:06 CDT 2006
weak, reactiv source indicts from those w a cursory understanding of the
issue are more than welcome as much as they are predictable. as a dumb
ass president says: "bring it!" rove is going to jail and that's all there
is to it! HA HA HA...the republicans are fucked forever....
Karl Rove Indicted on Charges of Perjury, Lying to Investigators
????By Jason Leopold
????t r u t h o u t | Report
Saturday 13 May 2006
Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald spent more than half a day Friday at
the offices of Patton Boggs, the law firm representing Karl Rove.
????During the course of that meeting, Fitzgerald served attorneys for
former Deputy White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove with an indictment
charging the embattled White House official with perjury and lying to
investigators related to his role in the CIA leak case, and instructed one
of the attorneys to tell Rove that he has 24 business hours to get his
affairs in order, high level sources with direct knowledge of the meeting
said Saturday morning.
????Robert Luskin, Rove's attorney, did not return a call for comment.
Sources said Fitzgerald was in Washington, DC, Friday and met with Luskin
for about 15 hours to go over the charges against Rove, which include
perjury and lying to investigators about how and when Rove discovered that
Valerie Plame Wilson was a covert CIA operative and whether he shared that
information with reporters, sources with direct knowledge of the meeting
????It was still unknown Saturday whether Fitzgerald charged Rove with a
more serious obstruction of justice charge. Sources close to the case said
Friday that it appeared very likely that an obstruction charge against Rove
would be included with charges of perjury and lying to investigators.
????An announcement by Fitzgerald is expected to come this week, sources
close to the case said. However, the day and time is unknown. Randall
Samborn, a spokesman for the special prosecutor was unavailable for comment.
In the past, Samborn said he could not comment on the case.
????The grand jury hearing evidence in the Plame Wilson case met Friday on
other matters while Fitzgerald spent the entire day at Luskin's office. The
meeting was a closely guarded secret and seems to have taken place without
the knowledge of the media.
????As TruthOut reported Friday evening, Rove told President Bush and Chief
of Staff Joshua Bolten, as well as a few other high level administration
officials, that he will be indicted in the CIA leak case and will
immediately resign his White House job when the special counsel publicly
announces the charges against him, according to sources.
????Details of Rove's discussions with the president and Bolten have spread
through the corridors of the White House, where low-level staffers and
senior officials were trying to determine how the indictment would impact an
administration that has been mired in a number of high-profile political
scandals for nearly a year, said a half-dozen White House aides and two
senior officials who work at the Republican National Committee.
????Speaking on condition of anonymity Friday night, sources confirmed
Rove's indictment was imminent. These individuals requested anonymity saying
they were not authorized to speak publicly about Rove's situation. A
spokesman in the White House press office said they would not comment on
"wildly speculative rumors."
????Rove's announcement to President Bush and Bolten comes more than a month
after he alerted the new chief of staff to a meeting his attorney had with
Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in which Fitzgerald told Luskin that
his case against Rove would soon be coming to a close and that he was
leaning toward charging Rove with perjury, obstruction of justice and lying
to investigators, according to sources close to the investigation.
????A few weeks after he spoke with Fitzgerald, Luskin arranged for Rove to
return to the grand jury for a fifth time to testify in hopes of fending off
an indictment related to Rove's role in the CIA leak, sources said.
????That meeting was followed almost immediately by an announcement by
newly-appointed White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten of changes in the
responsibilities of some White House officials, including Rove, who was
stripped of his policy duties and would no longer hold the title of deputy
White House chief of staff.
????The White House said Rove would focus on the November elections and his
change in status in no way reflected his fifth appearance before the grand
jury or the possibility of an indictment.
????But since Rove testified two weeks ago, the White House has been
coordinating a response to what is sure to be the biggest political scandal
it has faced thus far: the loss of a key political operative who has been
instrumental in shaping White House policy on a wide range of domestic
????Rove testified that he first found out about Plame Wilson from reading a
newspaper report in July 2003 and only after the story was published did he
share damaging information about her CIA status with other reporters.
????However, evidence has surfaced during the course of the two-year-old
investigation that shows Rove spoke with at least two reporters about Plame
Wilson prior to the publication of the column.
????The explanation Rove provided to the grand jury - that he was dealing
with more urgent White House matters and therefore forgot - has not
convinced Fitzgerald that Rove has been entirely truthful in his testimony
and resulted in the indictment.
????Some White House staffers said it's the uncertainty of Rove's status in
the leak case that has made it difficult for the administration's domestic
policy agenda and that the announcement of an indictment and Rove's
subsequent resignation, while serious, would allow the administration to
move forward on a wide range of issues.
????"We need to start fresh and we can't do that with the uncertainty of
Karl's case hanging over our heads," said one White House aide. "There's no
doubt that it will be front page news if and when (an indictment) happens.
But eventually it will become old news quickly. The key issue here is that
the president or Mr. Bolten respond to the charges immediately, make a
statement and then move on to other important policy issues and keep that as
the main focus going forward."
????Jason Leopold spent two years covering California's electricity crisis
as Los Angeles bureau chief of Dow Jones Newswires. Jason has spent the last
year cultivating sources close to the CIA leak investigation, and is a
regular contributor to t r u t h o u t. He is the author of the new book
NEWS JUNKIE. Visit www.newsjunkiebook.com for a preview.
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
More information about the Mailman