[eDebate] Geez - We have no method......
Sun May 7 14:27:28 CDT 2006
Typos not relevent.....guess what never mentioned them....what are you
"Topic Committee Ass Kisser" comment proves my point...getting mad at me for
calling out your rudeness is not exactly a successful tactic. Nor does it
change the subject from your rudeness to the committee and its members to
your hatred of me...Not playing.
Dont need me to interpret anything - I used direct quotes from you that you
dont even try to explain your way out of. Pure contempt. No answer, no
apologies, just more rudeness and unprofessionalism.
Broad resolutions, cool, go for it....Not the point...Once again you can
keep obfuscating but the point is you have contempt for everyone and were
rude to Ken for no reason.
On 5/7/06, debate at ou.edu <debate at ou.edu> wrote:
> Topic Comittee Ass Kisser,
> Did the typo errors bother you? I guess that proves I cant live up to
> your standards.
> Should I wear a scarlet letter A to the meeting, so everyone can know i am
> the egocentric dumbass that knows
> nothing about debate and must have josh hoe interpret what I say so
> everyone can understand.
> Us dumb people that like broad resolutions and dont need it explicated in
> the resolution might need directions
> to KC, you got any josh?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Josh Hoe <jbhdb8 at gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday, May 7, 2006 11:59 am
> Subject: Re: [eDebate] Geez - We have no method......
> > Hello,
> > Two things were exposed by this email:
> > 1. People who support traditional topic construction are sheep
> > "I think this explains how the cattle is herded, but what are the
> > pillars of
> > pedigogy utilized to create a topic wording."
> > It sure is nice that Jackie is around to set us all straight about
> > what the
> > liberatory pedagogy is...Golly gee, and before I met Jack I looked
> > and acted
> > just like sheep...Thank goodness for the Jackie method....Thank God
> > he is
> > coming to save us all with his liberatory methods. Jack brand
> > Topics "thank
> > goodness."
> > 2. The topic committee and relationship to the larges community are
> > mostcharacterized by shadiness.
> > "If you want to say nothing "shady" happens in this community
> > dealing with
> > rules, what the topic areas are and other issues, then you are
> > really just
> > kissing some a$$ right now."
> > Yes, its true, even though he is leaving the community he just HAD
> > to smooch
> > some ass before he left. You are so wise....Your backhanded "I am
> > surepeople really try" stuff is exposed for what it is nonsense.
> > You are on a
> > crusade and the topic committee will feel your crusading presence
> > soon.
> > Most important, you are right, I know when I was on the topic
> > committee we
> > got together in our secret community circumventing meeting prior to
> > the open
> > meeting....We planned out the arguments we would have before hand
> > so it
> > would appear we didnt have a real common agenda....We agreed on
> > which topic
> > we would write ahead of time and the other topics were just
> > smokescreens so
> > that we would never have a broad topic again.
> > Most important, it is obvious that you have contempt for the people
> > and the
> > process. Not sure why anyone should give you the consideration you
> > expectof them given your open superiority and contempt.
> > Maybe that wasnt what you intended? If not, your frustrations with
> > theprocess are igniting some reactions that maybe are a bit over
> > the line?
> > I am looking forward to the "Post Topic Committee" Jackie report
> > which I
> > suspect will read like somewhat like the Weekly World News.
> > Frankly, this isnt even about broad or limited topics....As you
> > know, I like
> > limited topics, but I am more than willing to go with a "Jackie"
> > topic once
> > as an experiment...I, for one, cant wait to see the miraculous
> > effects.
> > Josh
> > aka topic committee ass kisser
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mailman