[eDebate] Step 1 or Step 2?
Sun May 7 18:40:06 CDT 2006
At 03:38 PM 5/7/2006, debate at ou.edu wrote:
>The Topic Comittee Chair says:
>Reminder that Step 1 (or maybe it's step 2) in the topic process is coming to
>a close tomorrow at noon. If you want your preference to have an impact (and
>we've had several really close elections the past few years) you have to vote
>for the area by noon tomorrow.
>That could be confusing Sir. Mostly because Step 1 in the voting process
>was supposed to include a ballot
>with different topic areas, not areas of a topic area.
>I could see how you might get this confused! However, a small group of
>people decided we didnt need step 1
>this year from what I understand.
I can understand how you see things that way.
But, from my perspective, the Topic Committee decided more than a year ago
(giving dissenters plenty of intervening time & meetings to argue for
repeal) that the consistent second place topic area deserves thorough
A majoritarian process should not systematically shut out a large minority
(In this particular case, those who want a 'legal' topic year after year.)
More information about the Mailman