[eDebate] 2006 Debater's Choice Awards Results

Josh Hoe jbhdb8
Sun May 14 22:40:22 CDT 2006

My point was that any DCA author could still post those bios.  You seemed to
miss that one.

You make the comment that it is not: a smart, productive, or appropriate way
of proceeding. But make no arguments for why that is true.

Your next point about how good it was that those people were outed
publically because it sparked a discussion is pretty weak in that its a
discussion all of us have had for a decade.  Not sure those peoples pain is
worth your discussion.  Especially when the authors admit they lied about
much of it.  Is this really your argument?
Censorship occurs at all levels all the time - it is illegal when there is
something valuable contained in the utterances that were/are censored.  You
are certainly right that this should not effect the bios that are not
potentially damaging....but what if the next one was just as bad or
worse....should DCA post it anyway so that there can be more discussion?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20060514/83c758f3/attachment.html 

More information about the Mailman mailing list