[eDebate] 2 decisions about WVU JV/Novice Nationals
Mon Sep 18 11:46:23 CDT 2006
These decisions deal with eligibility and entry fees, both potentially
controversial areas, so please read carefully.
Decision 1: About 10 days ago, I posted to edebate asking people to voice
opinions regarding whether we should use the interpretation of the CEDA
By-laws for JV eligibility that we used last year (Option 1), or the one
that Georgetown used the previous year (Option 2).
Option 1 makes use of the ?exception? clause for JV National tournaments in
a way that ignores whether you have qualified for the NDT or been in 3 JV,
Open, or Varsity finals. In other words, under Option 1 (used by us last
year and also traditionally used by Johnson County for its JV Nationals), if
you are in your first two years of college debate (or first two years beyond
novice), you are eligible to debate at JV Nationals, regardless of whether
you have ever qualified for the NDT, and regardless of the number of finals
in which you have participated.
Option 2 basically indicates that if you started the academic year with JV
eligibility, you are eligible to debate in JV Nationals, regardless of
whether you reached your 3rd JV, Open, or Varsity final during the current
academic year, and regardless of whether you qualified for the NDT during
the current academic year. Where this Option differs from Option 1 is that
it does not permit someone who qualified for the NDT in a previous academic
year or someone who was in their 3rd JV, Open, or Varsity final in a
previous academic year, to compete at JV Nationals.
I received about 10 responses, all from schools that attended our JV/Novice
Nationals last year. The responses were split down the middle. Thus, I
have reached the following decision: Since I believe that Option 1 is the
best interpretation of the By-Law (and since there is no consensus of
community opinion, and since it will provide consistency with at least
Johnson County?s interpretation), we will again use Interpretation (maybe
that?s a better word than Option) 1 for the 2007 JV/Novice Nationals at WVU.
That means that if you are in your first two years of CEDA debate, or in
your first two years beyond novice, you are eligible for our JV division.
Let me note, however, that at least one coach indicated to me an intention
to introduce a by-law amendment at the CEDA Business meeting at NCA. That
by-law change would legislate that Option 2 is the correct (and only)
interpretation, if I understand the proposal correctly. If that passes, we
will of course change to Option 2 (or any other clarified version of the
by-law that is approved). I may very well support that proposal, but I
believe that under the current (and somewhat ambiguous) by-law, Option 1 is
the best interpretation.
I welcome comments as always.
Decision 2: Background: last spring, I indicated that we would charge $90
per team, with the opportunity to reduce fees to as little as $0 by
providing extra rounds of judging at $35 per round. The idea was to raise
some revenue to offset a portion of our costs, to allow schools to replicate
the previous year?s zero fees by providing extra labor, and to create a pool
of extra judging to improve preferences. Circumstances have changed since
then, and they require a change in the fee structure.
Let me recap by noting what we are providing at this tournament. We will
have 4 rounds on Saturday, and 3 plus doubles on Sunday, all on campus. We
will then have the remaining outrounds on Monday at the tournament hotel,
the Radisson (though I should note that we will have to have two octafinals
debates either on campus or in sleeping rooms at the Radisson?unless there
are two collisions). We will use 6-category MPJ for all rounds. We agreed
to provide lunch on Saturday (probably Chinese food, with two vegan
alternatives), lunch on Sunday (probably pizza, with a vegan alternative
other than pizza with veggies and tomato sauce), light breakfast both of
those days (bagels, with cream cheese, butter, and hummus, coffee and
juice), a generous supply of snacks, the famed pottery awards, and coffee
throughout the day. We have now decided to add a light breakfast at the
hotel on Monday and a light lunch during and after quarterfinals. Note that
we will be consulting further on the menu in upcoming months.
We thought the $90 was a reasonable price, but, as I indicated,
circumstances have changed. We?ve gotten a major contribution from the Dean
of WVU?s Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, Dr. Mary Ellen Mazey. This
will enable us (fooled ya!!) to lower entry fees. The problem is that I
have a lot to do at the tournament, don?t trust my debaters with money,
can?t do the math that easily, and don?t believe in the market model for
inducing community-minded behavior anyway. So (fooled ya again!!), IT?S
If you can cover your judging, you can bring as many teams as you like
without any entry fees. If you need to hire judging, you can hire it
through the tournament at $125 per uncovered team. If you have extra
judging, please donate it to the tournament (rather than hiring it out).
This will enable us to make up some of the remaining deficit, and it will
allow us to improve preferences. Indeed, we may not even use your extra
rounds (unless you?re popular!). Let?s show that a community-based solution
We look forward to hosting an even larger and better tournament than last
year?s. We hope to see many old and new friends in Morgantown, March 3-5,
West Virginia University
More information about the Mailman