[eDebate] Wiley defeated USC not Harvard
Tue Dec 18 19:00:17 CST 2007
Who knew Art was the mouthpiece for the whole activity. People are maybe
quitting because one person thinks Harvard couldnt have lost to USC in the
30s? I mean to cause responses like these:
:"Wow. I've come back to debate after a 15 year absence and comments like
this make me want to leave again."
"Wow...now I understand why people think this activity is elitist. Of
course Louisville and OU could never compete with such ivy league greatness.
I don't know why we don't just phone in our NDT votes for these three
schools and save the cash it costs to attend. "
I could be wrong, and often am, but I think Art was trying to say that
Harvard wouldnt have been hostile to the cause at the time in the same way
USC was? Maybe not...I dunno...I do suspect, however, that Art doesnt speak
for all DOD's or participants....even circa 1935.
On Dec 18, 2007 5:22 PM, <EMarlow at ucok.edu> wrote:
> Art writes:
> As a Harvard Debate Alumnus, I am somewhat disturbed that the film
> fictionalizes in this manner. While I am certain that James Farmer Jr.
> et al. the Wiley debaters were outstanding, *the notion that the Harvard *
> Debate Team in 1935 or any other year would have been weaker than USC or
> Wiley is ridiculous. Harvard, along with Northwestern and Dartmouth,
> has won numerous NDT championships, and when they have lost, it has
> usually been on 3-2 panel decisions that were close or hard-fought.
> Wow...now I understand why people think this activity is elitist. Of
> course Louisville and OU could never compete with such ivy league greatness.
> I don't know why we don't just phone in our NDT votes for these three
> schools and save the cash it costs to attend.
> ***CONFIDENTIALITY** -This email (including any attachments) may contain
> confidential, proprietary and privileged information. Any unauthorized
> disclosure or use of this information is prohibited.*
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mailman