[eDebate] Participant Consensus

Shawn Whalen swhalen
Sun Dec 23 11:46:24 CST 2007


A better system - 3 points for a win given by judge, 0 points for loss given
by judge, 2 points for a win that is negotiated, 1 point for a loss that is
negotiated.

sw

-----Original Message-----
From: edebate-bounces at ndtceda.com [mailto:edebate-bounces at ndtceda.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Kloster
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 6:12 PM
To: edebate at ndtceda.com
Subject: [eDebate] Participant Consensus

What would you think if after each debate round the participants had 15
minutes to discuss the round and come to a consensus on who won? If they
came to a consensus, the winner would be awarded a 1.5 round win and the
loser would get a .5 round loss. In other words each team would get a
half round bonus for coming to a consensus. If no consensus was reached
the judge would render a decision.

In the history of competitive debate has there already been
experimentation with such a concept?

Michael Kloster


_______________________________________________
eDebate mailing list
eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate




More information about the Mailman mailing list