[eDebate] I'm confused
Fri Jul 20 11:47:25 CDT 2007
I'm from the days post-merger so a lot of this conversation is over my head. I've got a few questions because I'm young (not dumb) and don't know any better.
1) What would be the net benefit of 2 topics over 1 topic? Sounds like an increased workload in scouting and research to me.
2) If the topic is really a non-policy topic, then how does that affect the activity of "policy debate"?
3) Scott Elliott mentioned CEDA's purpose and then talked about the 2 topics. I'm sure that CEDA's sole purpose isn't to provide 2 topics (one policy and one not) so what was he talking about when he spoke of "CEDA's purpose"?
Too young to know any better,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mailman