[eDebate] I love these topics!
debate at ou.edu
Thu May 31 09:15:15 CDT 2007
I think JT is so right
I think I have to add another top 3
13 - We can learn how sexists those muslims are
12 - if you have 3 choices, then there is an overwhelming amount of flexibility - even its three bad choices
11 - Exceptionalism is good judge!
----- Original Message -----
From: J T <jtedebate at yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:01 am
Subject: Re: [eDebate] I love these topics!
To: debate at ou.edu, edebate at ndtceda.com
> Happy birthday Blake!
> Jackie Et al,
> Actually, the resolutions are much broader than people give them
> credit (although still kinda dookie)---Many wanted more flexibility in
> terms of aff mechanisms---including yourself---that is, the aff can
> pick from 3 different actions and every combination of the three---and
> that third "foreign assistance" thing....that is an entire early '90s
> CEDA topic by itself...it covers frickin' everything! (yeah, including
> that awful "D" word)...Unless you believe that foreign assistance in
> every form is evil or genocidal, I see no reason why this should
> probably be the area where teams who don't want to be constrained by
> the topic will reside, comfortably...there will be cases about the
> arts & cultural exchanges, education, health care---
> As for the wording, the and/or cloud it up (and consequently it is
> not necessary to have more than one in a list)...and I have some
> grammar issues---but it is pretty straight forward, yet allows
> flexibility under a vague term at best "constructive engagement"
> debate at ou.edu wrote:
> I had to say something. No resolution has less than 45 words! I think
> i need more lessons on how to dumn it down for the people
> who dont understand like a subject heading in a course catalog.
> My TOP TEN reasons why i love this topic!
> 10 - and/or topicality and/or extra-topicality
> 9 - U.S. as savior - we will do it right this time!
> 8 - My plan is written already, i dont have to....
> 7 - I had a line of novices waiting outside my office door this week,
> pantering the topic from memory..
> 6 - We can give more guns to Isreal to crush those "terrorists" on the
> west bank
> 5 - This time i will get to really put my finger on "constructive
> engagement" -- what is non constructive engagement?
> 4 - We can finally get those damn critical teams to quit their funny
> business and give som AmRams
> 3 - No more nuclear war debates! right? more case debates with
> non-Khalizad or beardon impacts! right?
> 2 - The 50 and over club - which resolution has less than 50 words?
> (guess before you look)
> 1 - Narrow topics make you dumn - this has to end some day!
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
> Asst. Debate Coach
> Emporia State University
> ---------------------------------Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web
More information about the Mailman