[eDebate] Send Shirley Disclosure Now Re: Pre-Shirley Disclosure

lacyjp lacyjp
Tue Nov 6 11:15:08 CST 2007


Its due tonight at midnight. So post it or send it as soon as possible.

--JP



On 10/24/2007 4:50 PM, lacyjp wrote:
> 	[Summary: Post stuff on wiki soon. If you have intel that isn?t ?self 
> disclosure? post that too.]
> 
> 
> Once again, we?re looking forward to scouting the Shirley.
> 
> Our goal is to upgrade the scouting at opencaselist.wikispaces.com as 
> much as possible.
> 
> This collaborative goal will take effort on the part of each participant 
> in the tournament.
> 
> In the end, I hope the collective work will pay off by helping everyone 
> debate better.
> 
> To facilitate scouting during the tournament, we need a good deal of 
> pre-tournament information. That way, everyone scouting can focus on 
> upgrading what we've already got & gathering new information.
> 
> You can submit your information two ways:
> 1. Become a member of the wiki & post it (Easy, just label your stuff 
> ?Pre-Shirley?)
> Just go to http://opencaselist.wikispaces.com/ and click ?join . . .? Be 
> sure to include information that identifies you as a debater/coach for a 
> school in your request to join.
> 2. Email it to me: lacyjp at wfu.edu (This way may work, but it?s slow & 
> doesn?t get common cite requests out of your hair as quickly)
> 
> Target deadline: Midnight, Tuesday, November 6. This will make the 
> information useful before the tournament.
> 
> Expectations:
> 
> Affirmative Disclosure--
> 
> 	The most recent plan text(s) you've read.
> 	Complete 1ac outline(s) with full cites [Author, Source, Date,URL, 
> page #s, First & Last phrases.]
> 	2ac add-ons
> 	2ac answers to common negative positions (including off case args & 
> major case arguments)
> 
> 	If your 1ac is not 'traditional', describe your affirmative in as 
> much detail as necessary to provide the opposition the equivalent of 
> the above. [Plus full cites for anything that can be cited -- like 
> music or movie clips.]
> 
> Negative Disclosure--
> 
> 	Basic rule: Disclose the quantity & quality of information you'd want 
> from a team when you are affirmative.
> 	Include at minimum the generic strategies you've deployed thus far, 
> with a complete outline & full citations as described above.
> 	I say this every year: A good norm to strive for is MSU's 		 
> Pre-Shirley disclosure from last year at 				 
> http://opencaselist.wikispaces.com/Michigan+State+Neg
> 
> We don't expect you to disclose new arguments. Keeping ?caselist-able? 
> electronic versions of new arguments is a great idea.
> 
> A representative of Wake Debate has been assigned to each team entered 
> in the tournament. They will be in contact with your opponents, your 
> judges and maybe even you to gather as much additional information as 
> possible. We appreciate all the help you can give us in that regard.
> 
> Thanks!
> --JP Lacy
> lacyjp at wfu.edu
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
> 
> 
> 
> 




More information about the Mailman mailing list