[eDebate] [CEDA-L] The costs of a game, part 1: An unethical,

helwich at macalester.edu helwich
Fri Nov 16 23:50:05 CST 2007

If Louisville's arguments are about method, and the negative is structurally required (or incentivized) to dispute the affirmative, how could any debate with Louisville _not_ be about method?

Other than that, this reminds me of Gorgias. Perhaps Ede is Plato/Socrates in disguise (although certainly smarter and of finer metal).

In jest (sorta),

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Ede Warner" <ewarner at louisville.edu>
Subject: Re: [eDebate] [CEDA-L] The costs of a game, part 1:  An	unethical,
	amoral center
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:44:26 -0500
Size: 23718
Url: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20071116/61f18818/attachment.eml 

More information about the Mailman mailing list