[eDebate] 100 point scale
Tue Nov 6 10:27:18 CST 2007
If this is the case, why not just go to ABCs?
Given that judges change points as per the tournament/division, some are "stingy"/"generous"...I see no reason judges would act differently than in the example Harris gave concerning Emory's experiment...and I think there is something askew in this grading example...we can't look at a bubble/short answer test to determine their score...what one judge wants to hear, another will hate the argument/style...more variation in points = more leeway for judge variations....this also assumes every judge has a rubric A) thought out and developed, and B) and that those rubrics are all similiar in nature...If EVERY judge would put forth such a rubric, AND FOLLOW IT, then debaters would be forced to adapt...However, given that many judges are too damn lazy to put a philosophy up, much less follow what they wrote, I have little faith in this effort.
This does not speak to the long-term success or failure of the 50 or 100 point experiment...but it will take time to establish community norms...even more so given greater point variation...I just don't think the transition is worth it...I don't see people or schools leaving the activity because of speaker points...
Gary Larson <Gary.N.Larson at wheaton.edu> wrote: A couple of quick observations: I?m a bit bemused by our hand-wringing as to whether judges will be able to create appropriate standards or community norms in assigning points on a new scale (e.g. David?s worry that it will take 20 tournaments before assigned scores prove to be more than random). Considering that the vast majority of judges also have the ?day job? of assigning grades to undergraduate students that help determine GPA?s and can potentially impact graduate or job placements, I?m not encouraged to hear that we doubt whether they can handle a 100 point scale (or some other equivalent scale) for evaluating debates reliably. Since we typically identify the participants in the debate community as among the brightest and best, I would hope that clear instructions about how point scales work would reduce the chance that some judges might think that the translation should be ?old score + 70?
while others think it is ?old score * 3.3? I would like to believe that clear instructions can be successfully interpreted by all of the various judges that we have in the pool. But, of course, then perhaps we should imagine that judges could successfully modify their use of the current scale to reduce point inflation and scale compression.
Any scale will ultimately succeed or fail based on the common understandings of bright people who are interacting with student performances. That said, there is a different metaphorical force associated with a 30 point scale, a 50 point scale, a 100 point scale with whole points, a 10 point scale with decimal points, the current scale with the addition of quarter points, etc. Given my druthers as a sometimes statistician, I?m most easily convinced by the rhetorical merits of the 100-point scale since it has so many grading analogues in higher education. But I hope that we?re smart enough and committed enough to embrace a scale however we define it.
I should also underline one concern about quarter-points as the author of tab software. Considering the number of keystrokes required to enter number like 27.75 (while at present we can tab most scores with only 1 or 2 keystrokes), IF we?re going to improve discrimination by just adding more significant digits instead of using all of the whole (and half) points already at our disposal, my druthers would be to go to decimal points rather than quarter points. And if we go there, then perhaps the best scale is 0-10 with decimal points. But even there we have the experience of sports like skating and gymnastics relatively quickly discovering that they need to go to hundredths to get discrimination.
eDebate mailing list
eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
Asst. Debate Coach
Emporia State University
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mailman