Mon Oct 15 07:38:53 CDT 2007
Damn, Jarman is getting old.....
On 10/14/07, Michael Korcok <mmk_savant at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Scott Elliott writes:
> "I know we all talk about the "educational value" of mpj and can ALL bring
> up the bugaboo of rogue judges. When I coached for Florida State University,
> J and PJ lost CEDA NATIONALS on a 5-4 decision. The swing vote? A Judge who
> voted on topicality even though Jarman and his partner kicked T in the 1NR;
> but the judge felt it was his duty to vote against a non-topical case
> regardless of the negative team's strat."
> So? Steve Hunt voted against you all because you weren't whole rez even
> though Jarman began the 2NR with "We won't be going for whole rez. They
> meet. They are the whole resolution." Put it behind you... Get over
> it... It was almost 20 frikkin years ago...
> That wasn't the worst decision on that panel: at least Hunt voted the
> right way. Four frikkin geniusses lost their way completely. It should
> have been a 9-0 for SMS: you all couldn't and didn't answer "advertising
> employs people. lying attorney ads still employ people who make and show the
> deceptive ads and who work as assistants for the lying lawyers, unemployment
> kills. that outweighs the hurt feelings of a few lied-to schmucks. vote
> neg." Not rocket science there, swampy!
> Michael Korcok
> Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble
> challenge with star power. Play Now!<http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct>
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mailman