[eDebate] Reply to Massey-Switch side et al

Donald Bryson anabaptist
Mon Apr 7 12:09:05 CDT 2008


Always err neg on theory because the topic is biased toward the aff.
Elliott, 2008
(Scott, debate director ULL, eDebate. http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/2008-April/074567.html)

I will agree with Jackie that the topics should be written to allow affirmative 
teams maximum leeway. But it can be balanced with giving negatives some stable 
ground. Because what we do is by nature a competitive activity, interests such 
as fairness and a balance of ground is necessary. We can argue what we 
"believe" every day. But, when argumentation is recast as a game, with wins and 
losses, the goals of fairness within the game should trump your personal belief 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20080407/aa04176a/attachment.htm 

More information about the Mailman mailing list