[eDebate] Arms Control and Russian K Lit

Thomas Howard thowarddebates
Sun Apr 20 18:43:18 CDT 2008


Prozorov not Porozov, sorry.

http://www.helsinki.fi/collegium/english/staff/Prozorov/prozorov.htm

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 5:37 PM, David Glass <gacggc at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> yes, it is hard to avoid the notion that "giving K ground" = explicitly
> irritating one group or another, or explicitly being insensitive to a
> particular conflict or identification
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Thomas Howard <thowarddebates at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > http://acta.uta.fi/pdf/951-44-5847-8.pdf
> >
> > I believe that this dissertation demonstrates that critical literature
> > specifically rooted in Russia is focused away from arms control and instead
> > on Russian identity and European relations. Sergei Porozov and Andrey
> > Makarychev are, from what I've ascertained, the core authors in this
> > sub-field. Again, to echo Foy's truth, to many less K ground = better topic.
> >
> > -Tom Howard
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eDebate mailing list
> > eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
> > http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20080420/657f8a11/attachment.htm 



More information about the Mailman mailing list