[eDebate] "Sickening" Huh?

bandana martin drmosbornesq
Sat Aug 2 19:00:46 CDT 2008

lol pwned

On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Morris, Eric R <EricMorris at missouristate.edu
> wrote:

>  Sorry, I was just speaking from my subjectivity, which is apparently
> either unacceptable to you or at least nothing you care about. I'll probably
> keeping speaking from my subjectivity, though.
> I certainly was not defending his actions, although that would have make it
> easier for you, since you've been busy writing front lines for that.
> Even if you think there should be a serious public discussion about the
> round in question, I'm confused about why presenting it as a spectacle to be
> enjoyed is a productive way to frame it. It doesn't sound from your second
> post that you actually found it enjoyable....
>  Dr. Eric Morris
> Asst Prof of Communication & Director of Forensics
> Craig Hall 366A, Dept of Communication
> Missouri State University
> Springfield, MO 65897
> (O) 417-836-7636
> (H) 417-865-6866
> (C) 417-496-7141
> AIM: ermocito, ericandtaleyna
>  GMAIL:ermocito at gmail.com <GMAIL%3Aermocito at gmail.com> (please use for
> large attachments)
> ------------------------------
> *From:* edebate-bounces at www.ndtceda.com on behalf of Adam Jackson
> *Sent:* Sat 8/2/08 4:59 PM
> *To:* eDebate
> *Subject:* [eDebate] "Sickening" Huh?
> "I think I will just focus on your message "sign off", which ended with the
> word ENJOY. The fact that you feel an altercation which could have been
> career threatening to several of the parties involved is just public
> spectacle to be "enjoyed" sickens me."
> "SICKENS" you huh? You know what SICKENS me Eric? A community that revels
> in the fact that its true form will never actually be brought to the
> forefront. When you come from when I come from...when you lose at Districts
> because of "Mexican terrorists" attacking the US...when you lose to the top
> seed JUST BECAUSE THEY'RE THE TOP SEED...when you see Bill Shanahan's
> balls....when you have hold your partner, teammates coaches and colleagues
> in tears....THATS when you can I'll care about what "SICKENS" you.
> "Once you start down the path of making rounds into public inquisitions
> about whether prior actions (or prior identities) of the debaters are
> acceptable, it's hard to say where it ends. It's pretty easy to imagine a
> far worse ending, given how hurtful the entire encounter was for many of the
> people directly involved."
> UNACCEPTABLE....PERIOD. Why is it so hard to say where it ends? Seems pretty
> easy to me....HERE! I've talked to just about everyone "involved" (hell, I
> WAS INVOLVED), and they all thought that what Shanahan did was totally
> unacceptable....PERIOD. Don't debate it Eric...he's WRONG.
> _______________________________________________
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20080802/325964b2/attachment.htm 

More information about the Mailman mailing list