[eDebate] Quarters of the Ceda
Sun Aug 3 23:55:37 CDT 2008
as kade mentioned, having a debate in a round over who struck who from a strike card is not appropriate and ultimately non-verifiable.
take this hypothetical example-
Team A accuses Team B of striking a particular judge and says Team B should lose because of this for whatever reason. Team B says "No, we didn't strike that judge- you have no evidence we did and you can't prove we did."
There is obviously no way team A can be proven inside the round who Team B struck and the judges would have no way of determining it. No tab room would/should ever publicly disclose strike information, so there would be no way to ever resolve this debate. Also, many teams probably aren't even aware who was on their card/struck from their card, as coaches sometimes make these decisions without the input of debaters.
Finally, just because a judge doesn't end up on a panel doesn't mean they were struck. If both teams strike the same judge, the tab room chooses the three judge panel out of the remaining four judges at random, as there obviously can't be an even numbered panel.
Get more from your digital life. Find out how.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mailman