[eDebate] why the media blackout?
Mon Oct 20 23:33:45 CDT 2008
bear, not dallas, said "why on edebate?"
dallas granted bear's sketchy understanding of requirements but challenged my understanding of BOP. nowhere did dallas question the forum. perhaps, he will join the police force soon enough given that the judge in the berg case disagrees with his understanding of BOP which would invite suspicion as to motive.
why not edebate? edebate is a free speech list-serv that does not censor as long as certain bare minimum rules of identity are met.
again, reversing the sarcasm, because everything you always talk about on edebate is more important than the court cases against obama and the media blackout of those court cases.
you did and do have the option not to police the questioning of obama's citizenship. if the obama campaign is successful in controlling discussion of his birth certificate in most forums, why should the debate community replicate? apparently, many sites that discuss his place of birth get shut down. perhaps, edebate is one place where this discussion could be fruitful.
why would further discussion of this issue be bad for edebate other than injuring ultra-super machine efficiency of technological robotic debate forever the same and predictable?
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:21:38 -0400
> From: jbhdb8 at gmail.com
> To: oldstrega at hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [eDebate] why the media blackout?
> CC: edebate at ndtceda.com
> Dallas said "why on edebate" I suspect for the same reason, as valid (or invalid) as the question is to voters...unless it was intended as rhetorical - how would anyone here answer it exactly?
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Old Strega wrote:
> that's not what you're post sounded like.
> just because you can't answer the question doesn't mean you had to make a stab at belittling the question.
> many have posited a pro-obama bias in the media dating back to the primaries. what could be a greater bias than avoiding the question that would disqualify obama from the race?
> yes, jack stroube, the one who has posted as oldstrega many times before....
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:07:19 -0400
>> From: jbhdb8 at gmail.com
>> To: oldstrega at hotmail.com
>> Subject: Re: [eDebate] why the media blackout?
>> CC: edebate at ndtceda.com
>> The point was "how the hell should we know" Jack (if this is Jack).
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Old Strega wrote:
>> poor sarcasm. obviously, obama's citizenship doesn't matter and the tournament schedule is more important.
>>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:01:59 -0400
>>> From: jbhdb8 at gmail.com
>>> To: oldstrega at hotmail.com
>>> Subject: Re: [eDebate] why the media blackout?
>>> CC: edebate at ndtceda.com
>>> It was obviously our fault, debaters and debate coaches got together and extended our amazing media blackout powers across the US in order to help "that one" get elected.....Would that we could,
>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Old Strega wrote:
>>> below, i repeat my opening statement. please, explain this strange phenomenon of mass media negligence which allows obama to continue to hold his position on the ballot and as the frontrunner. there are 3 court cases against obama with regards to his being a natural born citizen and nobody is talking about it. why? because the obama campaign has been successful in defining the terms of its opposition much like the bush administration has done.
>>> "i have not turned republican but i'm curious why the court cases against obama and the DNC regarding the "existence" of his birth certificate are not a part of public discussion in the run-up to the election."
>>> You live life beyond your PC. So now Windows goes beyond your PC.
>>> eDebate mailing list
>>> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
>> When your life is on the go?take your life with you.
> You live life beyond your PC. So now Windows goes beyond your PC.
Store, manage and share up to 5GB with Windows Live SkyDrive.
More information about the Mailman