[eDebate] lacy and obama group think tactics

Thu Oct 23 20:57:33 CDT 2008

Could you go slobber somewhere else? Don't forget to listen to Michael  
Savage for your next "superior" argument.....
In a message dated 10/23/2008 9:52:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
oldstrega at hotmail.com writes:

basically, lacy sucks @ debate.

still no defense of the many  problems with fact check "authentication" 
already mentioned.

the  website link to "israelinsider thinks obama is a muslim" merely is an 
article  citing the AP photo of his indonesian school record where he was 
registered in  school as a muslim.   that's THE AP INDONESIAN SCHOOL RECORD that  
you're referring to.    you can believe he's a muslim today or not  from that AP 


21 months  ago: This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, 
by the  Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia, shows the registration 
of  Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro into the Catholic school made 
by his  step-father, Lolo Soetoro. The document lists Barry Soetoro as a 
Indonesian  citizen, born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, and shows his Muslim 
step-father  listed the boy's religion as Islam.(AP Photo/ Tatan Syuflana)

don't go  all in on your stupid muslim indict of the israeli insider 
destruction of the  fact check analysis.    IT'S A FACT, MORON.   OBAMA'S  FATHER 
WIRE.    i think this is what debater's call a "TURN".   lacy is trying to indict 
the integrity of a website who is not so  mesmerized by obama that they feel 
in their hearts of belief that even  mentioning the AP photo is a form of 
disloyalty to the new savior of the  american left.   citing the AP photo and not 
ignoring it bolsters  the perception of the newspaper israeli-insider.     
lacy never  even heard of the AP photo because he's high in obamaland.

what are you  an anti-semite?  trying to attack a jewish newspaper with bogus 
 allegations that israelinsider extrapolated from the AP PHOTO SHOWING ISLAM  
FOR BARACK'S RELIGION that barack is still a muslim.      please, show that 
quote or go back to your little league ad-homs.

on  your second point, not so good flow boy, oohhh --- israelinsider 
insinuates  that that factcheck had a conflict of interest with the BARACK FISA  
CAGLIOSTRO.   well, when they state the conflict of interest in  plain english, you 
have to refute that statement to make an argument unless  you're a novice who 
doesn't even know what an argument  is:


FactCheck  itself, as a project primarily funded by the Annenberg Foundation, 
hardly fits  the bill of being a disinterested party, especially given 
Obama's four year  stint as founding chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, 
currently being  investigated due to its massive withholding of papers which 
document the  catestrophic failure of the project, including public funds wasted 
under  Obama's leadership, and his relations in that project with former Weather  
Underground terrorist Bill Ayers. 

see, dipshit, obama worked for the  foundation that confirmed his birth 
certificate.   that's what  debaters who know what an argument is call a CONFLICT 
OF INTEREST.    to point that out makes israelinsider a really bad source.    
ooohhh  -- keep it up, you're making the mccain campaign look like a bunch of 
right  wing wackos...good job debate boy...

**************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites, 
no registration required and great graphics ? check it out! 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20081023/4d741462/attachment.htm 

More information about the Mailman mailing list