[eDebate] Registration code

Jarman, Jeffrey jeffrey.jarman
Fri Apr 24 10:26:24 CDT 2009

Nicole and others:  I'm sorry if the info on the code has not reached you.  I've sent several emails to provide the code to all member schools along with instructions to pass it out widely.  Our goal is spam prevention, not limiting access.  In fact, if you google "ceda registration code," the very first link contains the code (CedaweB -- caps sensitive).

We recently installed captcha on the site, and I will work this morning to enable posting for those not registered.

The site contains many benefits for those looking for a place to discuss a wide variety of issues, including the creation of group specific pages.  I've included the original email I sent in the fall below to remind people of what is possible.

If you have other questions or concerns, feel free to ask.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Jarman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 7:04 AM
To: Undisclosed recipients:
Subject: CEDA Forums, Registration Code and More
Hello Everyone:
As many of you are now aware, CEDA has a new web site and we want to  
encourage you, your students and any interested alums to register and  
participate in debate-related discussions relevant to our community.
Good news:  almost all of you already are registered at the new site.   
We used the site for online payment for CEDA Nationals and for  
balloting on this year's topic.  The goal of signing coaches up first  
was to simplify the process of assigning coaches a user status that  
would enable them to vote, while everyone else could sign up and  
participate in the conversation.  Now, we are ready to allow everyone  
else to register.
PLEASE FEEL FREE to pass along the registration code to any of your  
debaters or alums who are interested in participating on the site.   
The registration code is:  CedaweB  (caps sensitive).

Registration on the main CEDA site has many benefits:
*  you are automatically registered for the topic committee site  
(topic.cedadebate.org), a site where anyone can create user groups  
(groups.cedadebate.org), and several other subdomains.
*  you can post forum topics and reply to posts on the site
*  you can pay CEDA dues and fees for CEDA Nationals
*  you can post all kinds of tournament info and updates to insure  
everyone can access the info they need
*  the site is the location of all important CEDA-related information
In addition,
*  the site has RSS feeds, so it is easy to follow the discussion, get  
quick updates, etc.
*  the site enables newsletter signup to receive important information
*  the site social bookmarking for important pages
*  the site is built on open source code, which means we can add all  
kinds of features in the future to serve our needs.
If you have questions, please let me know.


From: edebate-bounces at www.ndtceda.com [edebate-bounces at www.ndtceda.com] On Behalf Of Nicole [nicole.colston at uvm.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 9:44 AM
To: edebate at ndtceda.com
Subject: [eDebate] seeing the forest. . .on our topic 'discussion'

topic time rolls around again, and i feel this surging anger and
feeling of inevitable disappointment.  i guess somethings never
change, or old habits die hard, or something.  But i am trying to be
reflective.  just two thoughts:

1) open access, you gotta have it, then you gotta promote it's actual
use-----do you seriously have to have the registration code for your
university to post on the discussion boards about the topic??? how is
this accessible to the community 'at large'? for instance incoming
freshman, people without programs, ex-pats in the 'real' world?  what
is a registration code? Do i need to pay ceda dues to add to the topic
discussion?  I just think the point would be to have a forum that
serves a purpose of open access. . .and eeehhh, not so much.  Plus, we
all know the all the smartee-pants (like me?) will  just use e-debate
to slander and confuse.

2) what are my topic 'worries'?  (we all phrase them as 'worries'-
btw, food for thought).  Well, that we will obsess about grammar,
definitional terms, and policy-esque style 'neg ground'. . . instead
of choosing a topic that fits the changes in our community practices
and evolution in argument and theory.  maybe we could leave some of
the ground and definitional debate to the debaters, what a thought!
isn't everything debatable?  can't we create SAFE debate space for

so besides these two things, i , nicole colston, vow to be a bit more
optimistic about the potential of the topic for discovery and
education. . . and to not bite until bitten.

hope you will join me. . .
eDebate mailing list
eDebate at www.ndtceda.com

More information about the Mailman mailing list