[eDebate] Incomeptency and 2ND Round rankings!
Wed Apr 1 11:53:58 CDT 2009
i sure could say it pretty!
699.5 points eat it
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Massey, Jackie B. <debate at ou.edu> wrote:
> all i have to say to you is
> FRAMEWORK... since thats all you could say as a debater...
> From: bandana martin [drmosbornesq at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:48 AM
> To: Massey, Jackie B.
> Cc: edebate at ndtceda.com
> Subject: Re: [eDebate] Incomeptency and 2ND Round rankings!
> this has got to be some kind of joke - your pre-district rankings were
> every bit as crazy at least regarding clay and jumbles - o u know the 8th or
> 9th best team at the D3 tournament lol
> the day jackie massey calls everyone ELSE cheaters ...
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Massey, Jackie B. <debate at ou.edu<mailto:
> debate at ou.edu>> wrote:
> Or you can just call it cheating.
> Someone ranked my team 26 and then reversed most of the order of most of
> the teams to probably help particular teams.
> I had a team go 5-2 at WGA and make it to Octos at CEDA and they did not
> get a 2nd round at the NDT. I looked at the rankings.
> If you rank to help specific teams, is that cheating?
> Should you lose your voting rights if it is obvious you were cheating to
> help certain teams?
> Or is it just unethical, and everyone loves this system?
> I dont get it and i dont get how someone thinks they can get away with it.
> This is not educational, and its not fair to my team who deserved to be at
> the NDT.
> Even if the other rankings would not have balanced out in our favor, there
> was still injustice and blatant cheating in someone rankings.
> Shouldnt they be called out.
> This the second time the AT-Large Ranking system plays favors. I am sure
> you remember the other!
> Fess Up Cheaters!
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com<mailto:eDebate at www.ndtceda.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mailman