[eDebate] repost: Final round video-need ec feedback
Zach Round The World
Sun Apr 5 13:53:51 CDT 2009
Good spread on CEDA vs. Basketball, but it fails to miss the point,
that was an example, not the crux of my argument. Those are all things
that are the way they are because of the media attention that
basketball gets today. They were not the rules that filming of
basketballl games started under. And for almost everything else my
answer is "why not?"
-Debate teams do not produce revenue for schools.
Why not? They produce money for the staff, what about debate camps?
You telling me that a debate camp isn't a revune stream?
-Debate teams are not followed by entire communities outside of the university.
But they are. Go to Youtube and look at how many deabtes are online.
Look at me I'm 15 years out of having any connection to any program.
-Debate teams are not regularly televised and schools do not get paid
for televised debates by networks. Debaters never signed any informed
consent agreeing that their image can be distributed on public
airwaves and Internets. NCAA players waive these rights with informed
legal paperwork. Their interests are protected by entire college
athletic (and legal) structures absent from debate.
1) why not? 2) I can promise that you waived those rights to the
school when you were admited. Anything you do while representing your
school is something they have say over, not you. Just like when you
attend a major league game by simpling buying the ticket you give them
to right to se your image for any thing they want.
-Debate teams are often not supported by school administration.
1_) Why not? Oh maybe because they won't let themselves be taped and
get some attention to the program. 2) Often? You mean there are more
deabte teams that get NO funding from the school then do? Amazing,
where are those stats?
-The vast majority of debaters do not get significant scholarships to compete.
Claim data warrant, that's how we did it when I debated, has that changed?
-Debaters do not have drug tests.
1) Why not? 2) Too many would fail 3) What does this have to do with
anything, they test me at my job, does that mean I can be filmed now?
-Debaters do no have an extreme code of conduct anything close to what
the NCAA does.
Why not? They could. I didn't know that common sense was one of those
things that could be codified.
-Debate stars are not public figures like NCAA stars.
1) Why not, oh that's right they won' tlet themselves be taped so
therefore they can't become public figures. That's not my fault, maybe
you need a better PR department. Even my lowely self was interviewed
by university paper and city papers. No bright line here. Then again
what are you trying to hide?
-The top debaters do not get drafted by a professional debate league.
No but they do try to get drafted into grad school.
-Most people do not find what the NCAA does objectionable, many
people, believe it or not, hate what we do.
So the way to get people to stop hating you is to stop them from
watching you? Only by shining the light of day onto CEDA's dark little
secrets can you hope to win over people. You are still close minded
and not looking at the big picture.
-etc etc etc
Um let's seem what else, people worried about how they look on TV?
Grow up, put on your big boy shorts and debate. At the level of a
nation championship if you are not worring about how you look you
shouldn't be national champion. If there is anything you might say
that could look bad is someone else saw it 1,5,or 10 years from now,
don't say it. I said some pretty crazy stuff when i was debating for
Carson (Big T Technocracy anyone?) But I will stand by anything I said
in any debate round that I was ever end. I said it, I meant it. Just
because it's switch side debate doesn't mean you can't be true to
We aren't talking about prime time TV, we are talking about posting
videos to youtube. I'm willing to bet there is a good chance that
every single person in the final round has already been on youtube at
some point and time.
I don't buy the arguement that debate forces you to defend things that
are objectionable. You don't argue that nuke war is good because
someone is forcing you to, you do it because it's easier then
answering the line by line. Show me the argument that can be made
where the ONLY way to win is to say nuke war good. The easiest answer
to Towson is to say racism good, and that africans are an inferior
race (you know those cards are out there) but most would never say it
beacuse you would have to have no soul to stoop that low to win.
So I ask this....
Say I show up to nationals next year with a camera, sit out of the way
of everyone and quitely sit and record the event.
Am I going to be kicked out? On what grounds? Is CEDA not a public event?
I make a recording and I post it, you going to sue me? Send a cease
and desist letter?
I said no way in hell.
It's much better to be open and up front, and say every second of ever
round will be recorded, posted, and kept up for ever and ever. And if
you can't live with that, maybe you should be debating.
I'm sorry i really had no intention of saying anything after my first
post, but your reply was so childish and condisending that it really
got my blood boiling.
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Steven D'Amico <stevendamico at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you are unaware of some the reasons for the policy. Most
> importantly, I believe there was a legal concern over privacy. It's not just
> about what happened last year.
> Let's count the other ways we are not like the NCAA, because I think they
> explain why your rant was not very well informed.
> -Debate teams do not produce revenue for schools.
> -Debate teams are not followed by entire communities outside of the
> -Debate teams are not regularly televised and schools do not get paid for
> televised debates by networks. Debaters never signed any informed consent
> agreeing that their image can be distributed on public airwaves and
> Internets. NCAA players waive these rights with informed legal paperwork.
> Their interests are protected by entire college athletic (and legal)
> structures absent from debate.
> -Debate teams are often not supported by school administration.
> -The vast majority of debaters do not get significant scholarships to
> -Debaters do not have drug tests.
> -Debaters do no have an extreme code of conduct anything close to what the
> NCAA does.
> -Debate stars are not public figures like NCAA stars.
> -The top debaters do not get drafted by a professional debate league.
> -Most people do not find what the NCAA does objectionable, many people,
> believe it or not, hate what we do.
> -etc etc etc
> Simply put, debaters should not have to worry that 10 years down the line a
> video of them defending spark will surface when they are trying to get a
> government job, running for public office, or doing anything else that has a
> routine background check.
> They shouldn't be forced to be on television. You don't prepare for a debate
> event like you would being on video. I don't know if you've ever been on TV,
> but trust me, whenever I go on, I spend hours thinking about how I look.
> Debaters should not have to deal with that if they don't want to.
> There have also been debaters who requested to be left out of videos because
> of safety concerns. (use your imagination on this one, I'm not going into
> Steve D'Amico
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Zach Round The World
> <zachrtw at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Long time lurker, reading lots of posts, but never posting, but this
>> makes me so mad I have to post.
>> Post the stinking videos! I'm an ex-debater who still likes to follow
>> along with what is going on in debate and I'm very confused not to
>> mention sad. I read the listserv and was at nationals last year to
>> watch, and was there for the big conflict, but this year I wasn't, so
>> because I wasn't there personally I don't get to watch the rounds?
>> Bullshit! ?The idea that a national championship would not be taped
>> and displayed for all to see is stupid. The idea that it could be
>> recorded and a someone could say ?I don't want to appear in it? and
>> you actually listen to them is absurd and makes me very sad. What
>> other collegiate competition would be this way? These were public
>> performances in a public place where anyone could attend. I know
>> everyone is walking on egg shells after the bill blow up last year,
>> but no one should have the ability to keep these videos from being
>> posted. This is really egregious considering that many of the
>> attendants are from publicly funded institutions. Courts have up he
>> idea that video taping in public is protected under the first
>> amendment. CEDA you are really being reactionary and short sited. This
>> is PUBLIC SPEAKING folks. If you don't want to be taped DON'T compete.
>> Your reasonable expectation of privacy went right out the door when
>> you joined. Let's me be clear, anyone can be recorded in a public
>> place, and there is nothing that can be done to stop it. I can follow
>> you around all the time and record every second of your life outside
>> of your house and post it to Youtube, and you have zero recourse to
>> stop me. You don't own your imagine. That one or two people could say
>> ?I don't want to be on the net? and let them have the final say is
>> stupid. This is 2009 people, everything is being recorded, and there
>> is nothing you can do to stop it. Can you imagine a basketball team in
>> the NCAA refusing to be televised? Anyways that's my 2 cents. I'll go
>> back to lurking in the shadows, and hopefully never see anything else
>> that makes me want to post.
>> Zach Ferris
>> Wichita State Debate 1994-1996
>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Andy Ellis <andy.edebate at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Andy Ellis <andy.edebate at gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 11:28 AM
>> > Subject: Final round video
>> > To: "CEDA-L at ndtceda.com" <CEDA-L at ndtceda.com>
>> > hello ceda....this may be a question specifically for the ec, but it has
>> > some aspects that i think are relevant to everybody.
>> > We went to ceda with two cameras and had every intention of following
>> > the
>> > video taping policy, I at least learned an important lesson last year.
>> > As we
>> > where setting up our cameras to tape the final round(for our own private
>> > educational use, large portions of the towson team where not there and
>> > hey
>> > who doesnt wnt a video of a team they work with in the final round of
>> > nationals)ceda ec members approached us and asked if we could shooot the
>> > offical tape because the arrnagements as i remember for them to tape it
>> > had
>> > fallen through. This went to the extent of agreeing that if we could
>> > stream
>> > it we should as gordon announced before the round
>> > started....paraphrasing
>> > now i said "uh you sure you wnt adam and i to tape and post a video from
>> > ceda, that seems to be exactly what the policy prempts(i was less funny
>> > then
>> > but still made the point)...yes...was the answer i got...so i toook the
>> > tapes and have been working on converting them as an act of community
>> > service....that brings us to now...at least two people have asked that
>> > they
>> > not be included in any video, and have reminded me about the policy that
>> > the
>> > round opperated under....im sorta stuck ive been willing to do the work
>> > that
>> > i have done so far in converting and editing the video but i dont want
>> > to
>> > post it if people are opting out...even with ec sanction...nor do i want
>> > to
>> > be responsible in that scenario for developing the "private educational
>> > purposes" system that will allow the people we want to see it to see it
>> > but
>> > not everybody else...? how to go fwd? thanks
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > eDebate mailing list
>> > eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
>> > http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
>> eDebate mailing list
>> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
More information about the Mailman