[eDebate] Fulltext Tangent

JP Lacy lacyjp
Fri Aug 28 00:21:22 CDT 2009


If all you've got is a retag of Wake's new aff, you are toast. You'll 
probably last longer with Georgetown's disads.

Good arguments *should* be "free-ridden."

Its called argument development. With shared scouting, everyone has a 
decent opportunity to engage in it.

-- JP



scottelliott at grandecom.net wrote:
> I agree with Michael. Please post all of your work in complete form to  
> Wiki. I hate this topic and have plenty of other things to do that  
> would be better than cutting detterence good cards. If you post your  
> complete work sets, I can simply cut and paste them into new  
> positions. It saves me a lot of work and needless duplication of my  
> effort. I will post all of my original work too...but, oh, wait, all  
> my original work is just a careful retagging of Georgtown's disads and  
> Wake's new affirmative. I am sure you will all be grateful for the new  
> tags though. Thank you all in advance for spending hundreds of hours  
> to build my files on this topic.
>
> Scott
>
> (for the obtuse is is a paradoy of a common problem called the "free  
> rider." I love nothing more than hearing a disad that I spent 40 hours  
> developing being run by another team in a round as if it were their  
> own...within 24 hours of the disad being broken.)
>
> _______________________________________________
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
>
>
>   




More information about the Mailman mailing list