[eDebate] [NDCA] Harvard HST -- Final Results
Newnam, William E
Tue Feb 17 13:39:17 CST 2009
>From one old man to another,
As I remember it, it was Rabin's favorite argument for through four years of college debate as well. Bronx also had three other teams that could have competed to win that tournament that year. They were a deep powerhouse.
And, while the internal link and impact might have been true, it always had some serious uniqueness problems. The "New Right" was never going to give up; and that story also seems dead on.
From: edebate-bounces at ndtceda.com [mailto:edebate-bounces at ndtceda.com] On Behalf Of Jon Cruz
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:16 PM
To: David Glass
Cc: David Marks; ndca-l at lists.debatecoaches.org; Regan Bozman; Andrew Markoff; Stefan Bauschard; edebate; Kathryn Clark
Subject: Re: [eDebate] [NDCA] Harvard HST -- Final Results
David is correct, I was off by a year. They won in '83 and lost in '84. I stand corrected! :o) (Though I appreciate Stefan's epic e-mail, and David's similarly epic e-mail below.)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:08 PM, David Glass <gacggc at gmail.com> wrote:
People might be interested to remember that one of the main arguments run
by that Bronx team back then (...and I think their win was 1983, and
that in '84 they lost in finals to Lake Braddock... though I'm not
certain whether or not I'm off by a year) was the "New Right" disad.
The thesis was that there was this rising Moral Majority, and that if you passed
the aff, you'd cause the New Right to backlash, and then these Right wing
crazy people would take power and destroy the earth.
So, ok, you may argue that the main thesis was flawed, and that it should not
have argued that it was good to back down just to avoid the Right
Wing's ire; but
it does seem that the internal link and impact story were dead-on.
Bronx wasn't the only team to run the argument, but it was definitely
Rabin's favorite disad for a year...
...and then there was the climate disad, run in the 1970s on the
world resources topic... everyone thought that was bs as well
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Stefan Bauschard
<stefan.bauschard at gmail.com> wrote:
> The final varsity elim bracket is available at
> Bronx MB defeated Colleyville MN in the finals on a 2-1 decision.
> Bronx won both the varsity policy and L-D divisions! Jon Cruz reports that
> it was their first Harvard L-D win ever and their first policy win since
> Special thanks to everyone whose cooperation was essential to the smooth
> functioning of the tournament. We completed 14 back to back rounds in 28
> hours on Friday and Saturday. We started at 7:45 am and we had the last
> ballot by 9:30 pm on both days. We didn't lag any debates, teams always had
> at least an hour to prepare, and we still finished 7 debates each day.
> I believe that all of the PF & LD ballots are scanned and available under
> the "pairings" tab. Four rounds of policy are available. I'll finish
> scanning the policy ballots later today and make them available tonight or
> tomorrow am.
> Stefan Bauschard
> President & Co-Founder, PlanetDebate.com
> Debate Coach, Harvard Debate
> Director of Debate, Lakeland Schools
> Founder & Editor, Politicsarguments.com
> (c) 781-775-0433
> (fx) 617-588-0283
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
NDCA-L (Provided by the National Debate Coaches Association)
** Simply replying to this message will send to the original poster and not to the list. **
To reply to the list make sure you include: ndca-l at lists.debatecoaches.org
Director of Forensics
Director of Lincoln-Douglas Debate
The Bronx High School of Science
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
More information about the Mailman