[eDebate] gerbil needs glasses

Old Strega oldstrega
Tue Jun 30 11:06:47 CDT 2009


1) you force people to point out how you drop the key argument over and over.  your initial strategy is to ignore the drop as if it doesn't matter.  then, when the opponent collapses down to pointing out the drop as their only argument, then you finally answer it.

rather be goebbels than a friendly fascist w bogus pretense.

again, the only conclusion from your style is that you are either: INSINCERE OR STUPID.
i'm not going to answer because it caters to your asshole prickness.
great, after dropping the soft coup 10 times you finally answered it. my answer is FUCK YOU and explain why it took you so long to answer it.
2) the structuralism card goes beyond admission of vocabulary.  OPEN YOUR EYES, LIL PRICK, STOP BEING A FUCKING ASSHOLE:
"What I have tried to do, is to introduce the analyses of a structuralist 
style into those areas where they haven't penetrated until now, that is to say into the domain of the history of ideas, the history of connaissances,the history of theory."

"INTRODUCE THE ANALYSES OF A STRUCTURALIST
STYLE"========="INTRODUCE THE ANALYSES OF A STRUCTURALIST STYLE
"INTRODUCE THE ANALYSES OF A STRUCTURALIST STYLE
"INTRODUCE THE ANALYSES OF A STRUCTURALIST STYLE
"INTRODUCE THE ANALYSES OF A STRUCTURALIST STYLE"INTRODUCE THE ANALYSES OF A STRUCTURALIST STYLE

3) WHY DO YOU HOLD THE STUPIDEST POSITION EVER?  foucault never changed his mind about himself once.   frankly, your consistent foucault who never opposes himself is wallpaper.   
are you really as fucking stupid as you keep pretending to be?   no, you're an asshole being an asshole for the sake of it and then pretending to be the innocent one.  FUCK YOU!!!    

_________________________________________________________________
Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that?s right for you.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20090630/5b2f7937/attachment.htm 



More information about the Mailman mailing list