[eDebate] Is there any reason why....

Josh jbhdb8
Fri Jun 5 16:15:24 CDT 2009


One reason of the top of my head

The topic paper explicitly was a POSTURE paper not a reductions topic (page
one)...many changes in posture dont require a reductions in weapons.

Josh




On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:39 PM, <scottelliott at grandecom.net> wrote:

> ....either one of these resolutions are not superior to the results of
> three days of overthinking?:
>
> Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially
> reduce its nuclear weapons.
>
>
> Resolved: The United States Federal Government should make substantial
> and tangible efforts toward abolishing nuclear weapons.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20090605/e35fa24e/attachment.htm 



More information about the Mailman mailing list