[eDebate] Is there any reason why....
Fri Jun 5 16:15:24 CDT 2009
One reason of the top of my head
The topic paper explicitly was a POSTURE paper not a reductions topic (page
one)...many changes in posture dont require a reductions in weapons.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:39 PM, <scottelliott at grandecom.net> wrote:
> ....either one of these resolutions are not superior to the results of
> three days of overthinking?:
> Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially
> reduce its nuclear weapons.
> Resolved: The United States Federal Government should make substantial
> and tangible efforts toward abolishing nuclear weapons.
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mailman