[eDebate] More Fun Re: Fun With The Likert Scale

JP Lacy lacyjp
Tue Mar 10 00:23:57 CDT 2009


In the interests of being "fair & balanced," two more questions:

I'm interested in hearing the "not nearly all" PIC

   1. Strongly disagree
   2. Disagree
   3. Neither agree or disagree
   4. Agree
   5. Strongly Agree


Me? 5. Especially if it really isn't "Nearly All"


Who cares about PICs? I still think the aff has to specify even if those 
PICs are bad

   1. Strongly disagree
   2. Disagree
   3. Neither agree or disagree
   4. Agree
   5. Strongly Agree


--JP
lacyjp at wfu.edu




JP Lacy wrote:
> Affirmatives should specify the subsidies their plan eliminates if asked 
> in the CX of the 1ac:
>
>    1. Strongly disagree
>    2. Disagree
>    3. Neither agree or disagree
>    4. Agree
>    5. Strongly Agree
>
>
> Me? 5. Strongly Agree.
>
>
> --JP
> lacyjp at wfu.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
>
>
>   




More information about the Mailman mailing list