[eDebate] "Fairness - white ppl guilty until proven innocent"?

Josh jbhdb8
Wed Mar 18 12:25:41 CDT 2009


Hideo Nomo, great stuff, good CP

J

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:48 PM, bandana organizer
<lifer-hat at hotmail.com>wrote:

> I just assumed it was serious since the "NOMO CP" is serious.
>
> Well, I assume the "NOMO CP" is serious.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Russell <jasonlrussell1 at gmail.com>
> Sent: 3/18/2009 12:48:39 PM
> To: edebate at ndtceda.com <edebate at ndtceda.com>
> Subject: [eDebate] "Fairness - white ppl guilty until proven innocent"?
>
>
>  Maybe you didn't read the rest of this casebook entry, but I'm doubting
> that
> this argument is meant to be taken at face value. The "Luke Hill Cred" Da
> sorta gives it away.
> J
> _______________________________________________
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com
> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20090318/077dd7e1/attachment.htm 



More information about the Mailman mailing list