[eDebate] Paperless, Time & Other Issues (Long)
Wed Sep 23 23:55:32 CDT 2009
The Shirley (Wake's tournament) enforces a strict 2:45 decision deadline
during prelims. We do our best to begin rounds on time by informing
participants regularly of the start time. Our tournament won't be
delayed because some rounds took "extra time" to transfer evidence. We
give participants adequate time to move rooms & plenty of time for
pre-round preparation (Typically 45 minutes from the release of
pairings.) I firmly believe that if rounds are scheduled with enough
pre-round prep & enough decision time, & debates begin as scheduled,
tournaments will run on time to the benefit of all involved.
That said, I fully support the move to debating without paper.
I think that paperless will eventually save time.
It currently saves time for paperless teams: No box moving, no time
wasted printing, streamlined filing process.
If we can eliminate box moving from pre-round prep, we will likely save
15 minutes per round & can start scheduling accordingly once the vast
majority of teams eliminate paper.
Transfer time: This is obviously the biggest problem at the moment. I've
heard all the horror stories but haven't witnessed any myself. I do like
Russell's "time is charged to the transferring team" rule, (I'm a bit
more flexible -- I'm willing to allow one minute to jump, dropbox or
otherwise transfer ev pre-speech because that is almost equivalent to
the time it should take a papered debater to do analogous things.)
I'd like to add some initial caveats (That are definitely open to
1. Once its up & readable on a viewing computer, other "transfer time"
should be charged to the opposition. If you insist on two copies of the
speech, or want to print their stuff, it comes out of your time. If a
team's viewing computer is not reasonably usable, we'll negotiate to
find the best solution.
2. "My computer sucks" is not a valid excuse. You are a debater. You
have one computer. There are many like it, but the one you use is yours.
You must master it. Keep your computer running well. Fix it or find
another if you have to. (Its still cheaper than printing.) The vast
majority of performance problems are because users do not maintain their
computers well. Saying "my computer is too slow" is like saying "my
filing system & in round organization suck."
3. One free reboot per team. Paper using debaters get one free time out
if their podium falls over. No more. No thinking during reboots. Make
small talk instead. The weather is always interesting. Make sure your
computers work. Communication is more technological now. If we are
trying to teach people to be better communicators & debaters, they need
to know technology. Learn what you need to communicate with the
technology you are using. Even Obama doesn't get a free pass if his
teleprompter fails. Transfer time longer than a minute might be counted
as your "free reboot."
4. Speech.doc organization: Due diligence must be paid to providing the
opponent with an organized copy of the evidence you read. Teams will be
penalized for negligent or intentional disorganization. (A 50 page 2ac
is facially un-acceptable. If you have 10 page frontlines to all their
arguments in a well structured document, I think its alright, even
though you should write better 2ac blocks.) Penalties obviously depend
on the situation: If the other team can't be reasonably expected to read
your evidence when you do, I may disregard the argument. If your
organization is so bad that they can't read a majority of your evidence,
I might disregard all your arguments by 50 percent. If I think your
confusion is intentional, you'll get the same penalty a speaker who
refuses to share any of their evidence with the opposition would. I
think you are obligated to provide a copy of evidence & other relevant
texts upon your presentation of them. If your practices fulfill that
obligation, you are fine.
I think this whole transfer time problem will be eliminated with time.
I'm more than willing to consider alternatives to the above!
Thanks to everyone who pointed out the problem & much thanks to everyone
who suggested ways to improve the situation.
-- JP "Make your tech work" Lacy
lacyjp at wfu.edu
More information about the Mailman